This is a dictionary definition. Non-combatant ISIS members are also civilians. Whether they deserve to die or not has no legal bearing. Im unsure why that is considered controversial.

This is not the legal definition of civilian.

He is by definition a civilian that was murdered. Legal definitions do not care about our political opinions. It appears to be very likely he was a civilian who deserved to be murdered but that does not change the definition

? Who said he was innocent

Clearly everyone here is illiterate lol

Literally the opposite of what I said. How do you go from ‘hard to feel sad about it’ to ‘ it’s truly terrible’?

Yes? They deserve to be held accountable but even in a fair legal system they would not face the death penalty while those actually directly participating in or ordering war crimes would.

Nah. It’s very easy to argue that murder is ethically wrong or unjustified but it certainly is effective.

I mean he’s still a civilian and it it’s still murder but yeah hard to feel sad about it

You think they’ll stand up for Palestinians when they won’t for their own diplomats?

Can confirm at least one

You can although that is uncommon.

The SA president seems amused if anything

If they intentionally murder a foreign diplomat that country would very likely to militarily intervene, Israel or not.

This would be entirely unsurprising to the majority of people outside the US

The diplomats are antisemetic for being shot at

Can someone eli5 why a plane successfully evading a missile is cause for panic?

I didn’t call you an asshole lol I just find it hard to believe someone would not just continue to pirate the software they already pirate if that remained an option

If they do it wouldn’t be Finland anyway

Both Sudans are facing active conflicts and humanitarian crises yes, but Sudan (ie the North) which you are likely referring to due to recent media coverage is a separate country to South Sudan which split from it a decade or so ago.