• 0 Posts
  • 21 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 17th, 2023

help-circle



  • Win or lose, I’m not worried about how it looks in hindsight. The way I see it is we’re doing the best we can with the information we have at this time. It wasn’t looking good for him.

    The effects of this change will also be much bigger than this election alone. It’s a jump-start in rebuilding the identity of the party into something that might actually interest voters.













  • I guess what I was getting at is that it might take another engine overhaul or two before it starts to feel “next gen” to me. Maybe consumer hardware isn’t ready for a game at this scale that has trees that don’t look like paper, textures that don’t look muddy up close, and some sort of particles floating around in the air so that the world feels less static. There have always been sacrifices made to create a world at this scale that performs well, and I just don’t think we’ve hit peak yet. This stance seems to put people on the defensive for some reason. It’s still a good game, don’t shoot


  • npz@lemm.eetoMemes@lemmy.mlAnother Starfield Post
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The engine is literally over a decade old. Yes, they have worked on it in that time, but it’s still Creation Engine with a new major version number. There were moments where I felt as if I was playing some sort of OpenGL demo - when I’m on a quiet part of a planet and all I can see is blocky terrain and a gradient for a skybox. Great game but it would be self-defeating to say there isn’t room for a more immersive sequel.


  • I said “there are areas” for a reason. Seamless space travel is more polished in NMS. Cyberpunk has more visual polish imo.

    It’s not a new engine. It’s a major iteration of Creation Engine, which is called Creation Engine 2, but not built from scratch.

    Calling it a GOTY for any year in the last decade is still high praise.