Regulating capitalism = authoritarianism. What a weird take. Regulating capitalism =/= abolishing capitalism, this I can understand. But your take… wow.

Simple yet perfect.

Not any guy, our very own Didier Raoult. Unethical, gross, money hoarding, conspirationist and overall public danger Didier Raoult.

Oh my dear Baruch, what did they do to you…

I couldn’t agree more. I thought at first it would be different, but, this aspect is awful.

I had the great displeasure of visiting their subreddit wondering if a few codes would be posted there, it was truly sad and frankly upsetting.

Dissenting opinion : ZZZ is actually neat. If you think about it, taking the f2p route, it has a nice and punchy battle system, the writing is quite good even if the story, for now, is quite… standard, I would say. I’m still going through the content, but even if I don’t think I’ll stick with this game forever, 50h of intense brainless fun for free is not something I’ll give an hard pass on.

That being said, yes, nothing beats a labor of love indie game.

Edit : couldn’t agree more with the character design, though. I wish it was less… let’s say… err… more… well, not what it is.

As you can check by my comments history I’m not an usual US hater. But here, I must admit this country is a professional shitshow.

steals “Warm mayonnaise”

Thanks for sharing, I like this one!

That’s very true, yes. And non-inherent hardly means “weak” or “inefficient”.

Indeed, I do think the same. What I have trouble understanding, and even with close friends, is how “no inherent meaning to existence” seems to quickly become, in some cases, “no meaning to existence”. I always tend to think this slide tends to exclude another possibility. A non-inherent meaning.

Why not neither?

Indeed!

I’m not qualified enough to approve or contest this statement, but I know for a /phisicistsfact that there was a time when great mathematicians were also great philosophers and they couldn’t conceive doing one without the other (Leibnitz or Descartes, among many others). Why I changed and exactly how, I don’t know, but I find it interesting.

Meh. Natural sciences and philosophy/methaphisics are quite closer/more intimately linked than you seem to think.

New meme template just dropped

Empirical evidence wins out in the end but… it’s not that simple. One name said a lot about this : Thomas Kuhn. Try giving The structure of scientific revolutions a read whenever you can. It’s old and there are more contemporary work, but Kuhn is still a reference in epistemology.

Alternatively, people may think they’re expressing “criticism” while just being blunt and cruel. Criticism doesn’t mean belittling someone.

And I know too much about this, as a teacher. Some of my colleagues wish they were little tyrants…

Ohhh. That explains quite a few things.

It’s indeed the name of a band