Lol you’re delusional if you think that most people would want others imprisoned for years for conspiring to cause traffic or even to cause it.

I prefer this Ubuntu

I think the largest challenge though is maintaining the distribution and managing the associated upfront costs.

Existing large content producers could likely afford to handle this but new producers could struggle paying to seed their content.

Though I do think overall this is more achievable than people give it credit for:

• YT videos don’t need huge bandwidth for a sustained period; only for short bursts. Most views come in within a week.
• Content is probably localized to specific countries. Less need to replicate across the globe.
• Let the source prefer to seed the highest quality and other peers downsample and replicate as needed.
• Doesn’t need YT scale. Tons of YT “content” is spammers leeching essentially free hosting from YT. No one needs to seed their videos if they don’t want to.
• 1080p is still fine for YT videos. h265 is very efficient (though downsampling 265 isn’t great). Don’t need 4k for most videos.

lol sure loser whatever

The fuck is with these stupid bots that try to turn every conversation into “muh immigration”

Yeah. Society is responsible for the outcomes of its children. It shouldn’t personally hurt your feelings but it should motivate your actions.

I agree. So if people are hearing it and demonstrating it with decibel readers then there’s probably little to no sound dampening.

It could be but also datacenters are ridiculously loud and the sound is very high pitched. Would drive anyone nuts if they could hear it.

I cannot read. Even better.

The lack of a return type declaration makes this sooo good.

In cases where something looks stupid but your knowledge on it is almost zero it’s entirely possible that it’s not.

The people that maintain Unicode have put a lot of thought and effort into this. Might be helpful to research why rather than assuming you have a better way despite little knowledge of the subject.

lol fat chance, keep dreaming idiot

I’m liberal but the first thing that comes to mind about this advancement is something negative. I would prefer a negative peace, an absence of conflict, to a positive peace. I’m a liberal.

Wow what a stupid misunderstanding you’ve spent so many paragraphs elucidating on.

Bro like 80% of the population lives in/near cities.

They’re not though. EVs and their infrastructure are still very environmentally harmful.

Not personal vehicles no. Half the pollution of a car doesn’t come out the tail pipe. EVs are a huge problem. Additionally the amount of EVs we’d need to make to compensate for all the cars out there is gigantic.

There is no good environmental argument for every household to continue to own a personal vehicle and to maintain and build the insane amount of infrastructure they need.

tldr; trains, buses, bikes unless there’s a specific need like for manual labor or going to very low population places

Just to clarify birth certificates are never used for medical treatment. If this information is needed the kind approach would be to add a new field to record gender assigned at birth.

https://www.usbirthcertificates.com/articles/what-do-i-need-a-birth-certificate-for

Birth certificates are not used for any medical purpose. They are entirely for identification.

Several of the letters make mention of his conviction. Someone posted them above.