A lot of conspiracy narrative is just pointing out things that seem odd and that’s enough evidence, you don’t need a conclusion
- 0 Posts
- 624 Comments
That’s why they went extinct
lugal@sopuli.xyzto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Did anyone else watch the Artemis II landing hoping they’d come out like this?English
3·6 days agoTrue, this post is gaslighting 101 but they can’t fool you
I thought that the implication already was that these accounts have the initially tried password
Certainly not Earth so maybe Pluto?
Ah, I didn’t think of it being Cyrillic. Thanks
Is this Spanish? Because I don’t know what else but Spanish typically is jajajajaja afaik
That’s where they land in Raised By Wolves, right?
What this chart forgets is that you can share your solution. You share your automation with a team of 20 or post it online and the payoff is much higher
According to the TNG story, they planted the seeds in very early stages of life so way before the last common ancestor of humans and dinosaurs
All mushrooms are edible. At least once.
They were much more diverse back in the days
She’s so afraid of Seven, she overlooks other dangers
I’m afraid a significant number of them does but prefer the second one. It’s easier to predict and less chaotic
It took me a while to think about what you are even implying and came to the conclusion that this is proof of a mars civilization. Either a human mars colony or a native species. Eitherway NASA is hiding it and I was complicit by suggesting an alternative explanation
It’s a mars robot designed to take samples…
I thought they went extinct long before 1915?
lugal@sopuli.xyzto
Science Memes@mander.xyz•Leaves have evolved at least twice 🤔English
31·10 months agoI think the question is how often it evolved independently like bird and bat wings evolved independently

I get where you are comming from but I wonder how much this is just about accesibility. If you have no connection to social science, you won’t click a video or read a book and even if, it might be jargon and hard to understand. If you are in STEM, you much rather watch a STEM content creator, even if they made videos about other topics. I see this more analgous to media analysis with a political lense. For example you like the Bee Movie and watch the Wisecrack video about it. It has capitalism in its name and maybe that’s a topic you are interested in but you wouldn’t search for a video about capitalism. But maybe I’m too generous.