Knedliky

Maybe in 2022 or early 2023. But it’s increasingly people who sign up because it pays well (archive.is link to bloomberg article, telegram link if you understand Russian).

Don’t give them ideas!

Ehm, while I appreciate the sentiment (as a properly deputized representative for all Germans), it may be not for nothing that the saying about not wanting to know how the sausage is made comes from Germany. Meat and sausages are veeery cheap here and while labor exploitation is certainly a big ingredient, I often wonder what the others are.

If you see Brad Pitt, better get off that train.

Step 1: politicians must pay for their own legal troubles

Step 2: “The Association of Totally Real Concerned Citizens” starts filing lawsuits across the country

Step 3: any non-billionaire elected to a political office is bankrupted within a year

Step 4: surprised yellow rodent face

(Bonus step 5: JB Pritzker becomes president and solves world hunger with deep dish pizza)

Edit: line breaks

Maybe this research and language is intended to suggest that there is a point past which “confusingly and unintuitively designed” strongly resembles “intentionally deceiving”? We’re probably not going to get internal emails saying “make it complicated so that we can collect users’ data”.

Also, researchers don’t really control how university press departments write up their results. Even less so when they’re interviewed by media.

Addendum: Apple takes great pride in UI and user-centered design, and lately they have been highlighting privacy as a differentiator from Android. Maybe they just dropped the ball, maybe people don’t care, maybe people aren’t very bright. Still, some people have questions:)

I thought have bought this was internet fake. It’s not:

Uraba lugens is nicknamed the mad hatterpillar because of its distinctive exoskeletal feature.[4] Every time it sheds the head portion of its exoskeleton, the exoskeleton stays attached to its body. Over time, developing through its life span, the head grows bigger and sheds increasingly larger exoskeleton shells, which build upon each other.[5]

Wikipedia entry

I tried to look this up and while there were many many results, none of them seemed to really fit with OP’s question, so would you kindly tell us more about the gay Spock problem?

From noted Marxist-Leninist publication The Boston Globe? Right on

The authors wrote that they were surprised too and went back to talk to the students and apparently there was an unwritten rule that you don’t date the ex of the new partner of your ex. So if Bob and Alice split up and Alice starts dating Ben, then Bob should not date Ben’s ex Alison.

Dragon’s Dogma?

Removed by mod

Was that about the racism or about the cartoonish levels of lunacy and corruption? We got the racism covered and I’m sure we will give the rest a decent try soon. I, for one, look forward to the German regional and federal elections this year and next. I’m sure nothing bad will happen.

Even that fear is not really supported by data, according to Cristobal Young’s The Myth of Millionaire Tax Flight.

Korrektes Zitieren hat nichts mit der Plattform zu tun, über welche du es bezogen hast. Du schreibst ja auch nicht dazu, ob du es auf Papier in deiner Uni oder über Fernleihe oder über die elektronische Autobahn konsultiert hast. Solange du es wirklich konsultiert hast und den Regeln deiner Uni entsprechend zitierst, hast du deine Pflicht gegenüber der Uni und der Wissenschaft erfüllt. Und übererfüllt im Vergleich zu so einigen. Elsevier und Springer werden es überleben. Bonus-Klugscheiß: nur DOI angeben hört sich nach Formalitätenklatsche herausfordern an. Erleichtere dir das Leben, nutze Zotero oder so, die nehmen dir das lästige Formatieren und so ab. Klugscheiß-Genehmigungsnachweis: Doppel-Doktor.