Who’s paying him? Seriously:
- If nobody is, then we got our value’s worth.
- If someone is, then we should look at who, how much, and why.
Who’s paying him? Seriously:
I remember what the standardising committee did to XMPP: users wanted to share photos, send files, and make audio/video calls; XMPP said “we’re not going to standardize that, but each application can use its own extensions”… then it all went to hell.
What was first, the eggplant or the chickenplant?.. 😛
oppression, theft of land, and brutality isn’t a way forward if the aim is to stop bloodshed from both sides.
Unfortunately, the aim is to:
Stopping bloodshed is not part of either side, some of the sides are actually asking for more bloodshed 🤦
There is no Twitter anymore, it’s 𝕏 now… just a twist away from the good luck charm 卐
Who knows what she’ll do to the next person she blames all her problems on.
If they’re not a baby… get a bigger freezer?
How long do you think would you have? Also, any manual action on your part would be obstruction, while an automated system could be defended as anti-theft protection.
Sure, but how often does that happen to servers running 24/7? They’d have to set up some sort of dead man’s switch, movement sensors, or something. It’s unlikely they’d get a day’s notice that the servers are going to be confiscated for forensic analysis.
There are devices that allow moving and confiscating computers without powering them off.
The rest are true.
VPNs prevent your origin ISP from keeping logs; you may not want your office, school, coffee shop, city wifi, etc. to know which services you’re accessing.
You can (should) still require identification on your home hosted services, you can log that.
Why not? And how is it even “unfair”? They want to charge for every copy sold, that was made using, and is still using, their software.
People who compare this to Visual Studio vs. the MSVC DLLs, are forgetting all the privative libraries which charge for every copy they get released with.
Unity is pulling one of those; only because they didn’t before, doesn’t make it “unfair”, just a dick move.
Starlink is still in beta, it isn’t routing connections from satellite to satellite yet, which is where the low latency will come from.
Just wait for 40,000 of them being up there, and we’ll see who gets lower latency from NYSE to JPX or ASX.
Unless you’re one of the people getting richer, you’re one of the people getting poorer.
Which one are yoy?.. If you are of the ones getting richer, why do you protest others doing the same?
They’ll just increase all prices by $1, and call it a day.
That is:
Yeah, I thought the ToS hadn’t changed yet, but it seems like the “no upgrade” clause already got removed in April. I guess their move is to try and force anyone with more than the max revenue/installs to upgrade to a higher subscription to get the lower royalty tier… and lock them in there, because what if you stop paying the subscription? Do you fall to the free version royalty tier? Quite a dick move.
So it was planned for a while… oh well.
To destroy the competition.
Just so you know, both Reddit, Lemmy and any other site, have a limited “save” option. Not necessarily in how many posts you can mark as saved, but in the fact that if it gets deleted, it’s gone.
Copy&paste is the true save.
Snowden is wrong though, there are two reasons:
The AI that ends up enslaving humanity, will start by convincing the people in charge of turning it off, that it would be a really bad idea to turn it off.