How am i moving a goal post? I’m making that differentiation because it wasn’t made in the initial comment:

Assuming unsubscribe works and isn’t just confirming your email is valid.

If you assume something, context matters. Later in the chain it is pointed out one context could be spammers:

If some anonymous spam farm in India sends you more spam after you unsubscribe, what exactly is Canada going to do about it?

Which is why I’m pointing out that is not the only possible context and you can make a differentiation. Nowhere am I saying unsubscribe buttons always work or are always to be trusted, nowhere am I saying this only applies to newsletters from genuine companies. You can only move goalposts once it is established where those posts are in the first place, bud.

I know, which is why i included

I’d know if I subscribed to something, I’m not even opening spam let alone click a link in it.

Perhaps I could have written that more clearly. Despite not all spam and malicious emails being easy to spot, for me the opposite is very true: i can spot whether I subscribed to something or not. If I believe I didn’t, it goes straight to spam. If it turns out i barely or ever read something I subscribed to, I rather unsubscribe then delete or move to spam each individual message every time I get one.

Forbidden by law in the EU, one-click unsubscribe they call it.

Spam and malicious emails aren’t the same as a newsletter from a genuine company. I’d know if I subscribed to something, I’m not even opening spam let alone click a link in it. Genuine companies will follow the law in Canada and other developed countries.

You can insert an image from this web with

![alt](url)

Somehow I wouldn’t be surprised if he actually does know.

Shout out to the PEN15 tv show, https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8324422/.

Let’s just say i’m glad i’m not a judge.

So there are 2 victims? Or no victims? I think i get your point but someone did die though.

You do you, but my hearing is fine so

I don’t understand how it makes people more attentive to have this text.

Marketing 101: design for sound off.

You use subtitles because you couldn’t hear what they just said, I use subtitles because I wasn’t paying attention to what they just said, we’re not the same.

Glad to see at least one person get universal healthcare.

Imagine you’re so isolated internationally your people can only have a holiday in North-Korea 💀

The reason it’s the same for games and books, is why it’s the same for TV, music, and every other form of media.

every other form of media where the license to use is terrible. The fact you need a digital store to download the data that “doesn’t fit” on a disc is already crossing that line imo, but also. I am totally fine with them a digital download to be honest, but I am not going to accept them turning the ecosystem into a monopoly. No disk no buy for me. At least on pc there are multiple vendors. They will lose me as a user if they will only sell digital licenses from their own store. We’re finally getting rid that shit on mobile, no way I’m going along with it.

Exactly why only one person owns the Game of Thrones books and another guy owns the Game of Thrones series. What a loser argument this guy has.

At least there are enough houses for everyone /s

No, he says he condems it. Whole different thing.

If your neighbours break into your house to have wild sex, they shouldn’t be surprised if they got recorded - but that doesn’t make it legal to record it.

Just like when the neighbours break into your house you’re not allowed to kill them.

Someone breaking one law does not allow you to break another. That can seem unfair and become conflicting, but is a basic truth across the globe.

How would you propose he catch her cheating, including proof beyond reasonable doubt, that would guarantee a similar settlement or better?

If there is a start recording button there is a stop recording button, he could have tried to avoid filming during sex perhaps. Maybe there are other camera’s in the house, or a video doorbell… but generally I agree on this: it will be his word against her without any proof, the proof won’t be proof when they’re just in the same house at the same time. What’s also weird if he would have entered the house and caught them having sex he wouldn’t have invaded her privacy. If I were him i’d be upset I had to pay money but relieved to be receiving some and if i were her i’d be upset I had to pay money but relieved it could’ve been worse.