

I can’t even conceptualize the word “naturalization”. When we really mean to say “citizenship”.
Anyway let’s talk about the actual bigot here, instead of the anecdotal one. I wonder which would be stronger here: his religious extremism, his psychopathic inclination and/or his religion and culture presenting a possible relief vector for his inclination.



I disagree. You become a citizen, you acquire citizenship. The right to participate in civil society.
A natural doesn’t acquire citizenship, it’s innate. A natural is a citizen, but a citizen doesn’t need to be a natural.
You cannot change your nature, your past, your beginning to somewhere else.