flandish

shareholders losing value when another country they did not invest in taking over. you know that “market and invisible hand”

what they are really saying, especially with the “slow down china bad” rhetoric is just temporally advanced from stuff Adam Smith wrote about, long ago: they cannot keep up and are crying to the powers so shareholders are protected

i don’t disagree

i’m trying to say two things can be true at once.

zionists are calling the shots in “american venues”

“stakeholders” decided this, btw, not necessarily Sheeran himself.

reminder that capitalism only ever thinks about “stakeholders” and “profit”

i dont care who did the accusing. i want to know who was accused.

why does who matter?

don’t forget, all guns are loaded until they are in your hands and you prove them not to be.

uber driver can safely assume said gun is loaded.

you are either not american or homeschooled or got a lucky tech school in the 90’s.

simple reminder: capitalism will do this, every single chance it gets. this isn’t an ai thing or a sam altman thing, it’s a capitalist thing. since forever.

i tend to call that stuff “ML” (machine learning) instead if AI thanks to the dumbass marketing of today. been working in ML for decades.

just fyi the internet archive storage is most definitely in a data center or 3. your hospitals use data centers, schools too. just not at the scale of ai types.

because capitalists are truly a different species so his peers don’t see him as gay, just as $.

bog standard capitalism, really.

there is not “no way” when the plcs that read / send to the coils are basically software controlled actuators.

i “violence” as much as i want. which is to say none. like most people, i imagine. a atate will violence for profit and control, always, and make mistakes all along the way. you seem to be ok with this, and the way the boot tastes?

who said anything about a free for all?

*any - except the oppression of people who choose to be fascist or zionist. we fully support the oppression of scum.

then i reckon the state should not have a monopoly on violence then huh? ;)