What about drones? (The latex kind)
- 0 Posts
- 283 Comments
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•What "unique" or single-game-genre games have you enjoyed?English
4·2 years agoTerra Nil. It’s an anti city builder. Land in a polluted wasteland, clean the soil, plant seeds, set up ecosystems, make sure they can persist without you, and recycle all your structures before you leave. Appreciate the beauty of the natural ecosystem you restored as you fly away.
I want more games like this.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•What "unique" or single-game-genre games have you enjoyed?English
1·2 years agoAntichamber is the game like Portal
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•What "unique" or single-game-genre games have you enjoyed?English
1·2 years agoOuter Wilds spoiler
Deathloop is the same genre
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
People Twitter@sh.itjust.works•We coulda had Bernie...English
61·2 years agoThe SJWs aren’t the ones abstaining, it’s the centrists on lemmy.ml
Well we write 12 like this: 10
It’s easy
Miss you with the greatest passion
No, it’s observation. An experiment involves manipulating an independent variable while controlling other variables. There’s none of that in space, not counting the ISS and Apollo. That said, you can still test hypotheses using observation. And that’s equally true in both astronomy and in social sciences.
That’s irrelevant. Astronomy and polsci can both only test their hypotheses through observation.
What are soft sciences supposed to do when experimental methods are either impractical or unethical?
Same thing astronomy did.
Hey genius, if you need experimentation in order for a field to be a real science, then explain how astronomy is a science.
It’s mainly called social science in my country.
Same with Astronomy.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
People Twitter@sh.itjust.works•This is a little believable...English
8·2 years agoY’all straight people who only just heard of this discourse should spend more time listening to asexuals
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
People Twitter@sh.itjust.works•This is a little believable...English
43·2 years agoThey’re just being puritanical or shy with their movie watching company.
Or asexual and sex repulsed, or sexually traumatized. Why do you jump straight to calling people reactionaries when there are perfectly good legitimate reasons for their behaviour? It’s almost like you don’t believe in asexuals.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
People Twitter@sh.itjust.works•It's hard to watch your favorite team loseEnglish
4·2 years agoCan’t you red card the bullies?
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Games@sh.itjust.works•Analysts: PS5 Outsold Xbox Almost 5 To 1 This Past QuarterEnglish
3·2 years agoWell the last one was One so this one must be Two
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Climate@slrpnk.net•Five Things the “Nuclear Bros” Don’t Want You to Know About Small Modular ReactorsEnglish11·2 years agoHumanity has never built anything that has intentionally lasted 10,000 years
You don’t know what those cave people were thinking when they drew those pictures.
exocrinous@startrek.websiteto
Technology@beehaw.org•Self-balancing commuter pods ride old railway lines on demandEnglish
10·2 years agoThese pods are only used on rails with very low ridership. They would switch to a train if ridership increased.
Look at it this way: you can have a train that has a capacity of 100 people, but it only runs once a day due to the low demand, and only 2 people want to ride it at that time of day…Or you can have 10 pods, which do not require as much railway maintenance, and they can carry the 10 people who actually want to use this railway, completely on demand.
Yeah, a train is better if you want to move ten thousand people a day at peak hour. But this is a cheaper way to move ten people at different times across a day. And it’s a cheaper way of inducing the demand that would justify the more efficient kind of expansion.

The ability to create dispassionate political systems is, in nature, a uniquely human ability. Wolves and ants have political systems, but the systems rely on direct and intentional involvement, at least as much as anything an ant does can be intentional.
Ants don’t have recessions, or gas chambers, or nuclear bombs, or greenhouse gas pollution, or strip mining, or seafloor dragging. That’s a human invention.