Although completely reasonable, I fear that your conclusion is inaccessible for most folks.

And as a pedestrian, I’m all for a system that’s capable of reducing distracted driving.

Agreed. I’m just pointing out that people need to focus on the latter rather than the former.

That’s the part that I don’t think is a strong argument though. They were crying fraud long before the election, e.g., saying that mail-in ballots were illegal, claiming people were stuffing drop-off, etc. None of it was valid, but their argument was well established before election day.

Ah ok. Thank you. I think I was getting stuck on the timing, which did not seem particularly relevant.

Except weren’t they were claiming that mail-in ballots were potentially fraudulent for months before the election? This video doesn’t disprove anything if they claimed that ballots that had already been cast were illegal.

Malazan Book of the Fallen is one of the best brick walls I’ve ever put my head through.