Thus the need for rules 7/8…

Awesome! Going on the list!

Just report please. There is an influx of spam from lemmy.1095.me, which I’ve already shared to the lemmy.world team.

TCL Flip.

Its also like $100

That is… frankly just nuts, and I’m sorry to hear it.

It sounds like the majority are still on the same connections I was envious of 30ish years ago, and the government certainly isn’t helping things.

Is it really??

I used to be jealous of some friends with their 10mbit symmetric lines while I was getting a whopping 4mbps (down only) on cable. (Obviously… not recent).

It hasn’t been made an official rule yet, just the discussion on it.

Thats on me, holiday weekend + travel so I haven’t cemented from the discussion results.

Just got home after a few days away, so while ive been removing the offhand problem posts and comments, I haven’t had time to do much more yet.

I just use an internal proxy with the same endpoint and same cert.

OG KeePass program was never written for Linux

It’ll run with mono, package is named keepass2 on deb, keepass on arch and fedora, among others.

https://keepass.info/download.html

Contributed/unofficial keepass section at the bottom, the top contributed section is a list of ports

I think you may be misunderstanding the terminology here.

AI is a general term. LLMs are a subset, as are ML, DL, ANNs, NLP, CV, Expert models, etc.

Today you would define what we have as ANI, where the “N” stands for “Narrow”. This is also known as “weak” AI.

What you’re referring to would be called AGI, where the “G” stands for “General”, where an AI would have a human degree of intelligence. This is pure concept today, and does not exist.

Also on the list would be ASI, where the “S” is for “Super”, where the AI in question has more collective intelligence than humanity across all domains. This is purely hypothetical.

But AI has existed for decades. The first application I know of is Dendral, which was created in the 1950s to analyze mass spectrometry data to identify organic molecules. This was what’s called an Expert model - basically a lot of if-then statements, and led to things like MYCIN.

We don’t need to redefine words here.

That being said, it should be okay for users to call out an obvious grift, or a “nonsense repo” that’s actually pure slop.

Especially if the disclosure is blatantly a lie, absolutely. I’d also say if you see any indicators that they are lying in the disclosure, its still worthy of reporting - but I would say report and separately message the “why”, to limit visibility of seeing those indicators.

Just to point out a few projects that allow AI contributions:

• Firefox
• NodeJS
• Chromium
• curl
• Go
• InfluxDB
• MariaDB
• Prometheus
• Linux
• openSSL
• Blender
• Mattermost
• Caddy

If you want all projects related to AI in a different community, it may be easier for you to start “selfhosted_without_ai” or something.

Eh, its fine. Certainly better than the “I don’t like this so I’m going to report it” approach.

@[email protected] this comment is not (directly) for you, I just want it in context.

Before you report someone for breaking rule 1, please look a the context. Specifically, the username someone may be replying to.

Its fully open source with no payment required, so it doesn’t violate rule 7.

AI disclosure is a new discussion starting this weekend.

Edit: Please take a look at this post here: https://lemmy.world/post/48636804