Oh, I didn’t realize, that’s a hassle
Oh, I didn’t realize, that’s a hassle
Depending on your tech skills, tail scale works, but you could also set up a relatively simple reverse proxy: https://serverfault.com/questions/753105/how-to-reverse-proxy-to-different-places-depending-on-subdomain-in-nginx
That mans laugh really did it for me
I mean that’s only like $70,000, which I’m guessing for him isn’t a huge amount of money.
If you want a usable device with 16gb ram and a 512gb SSD it’s $1400 which is $300 (27% stupid tax) more than a comparable dell. Although I will admit the M1 chip in it will probably perform better at certain tasks.
I don’t think your trolling is helping the overall discourse
Why do you think inflation is getting so bad, specifically? You think it could have something to do with the $5 trillion trump handed out during COVID or nah?
I’m literally arguing against privatization in the adjacent post. Again, this is not productive discourse. “Burn everything down” isn’t a realistic or helpful suggestion.
I’m sure long-term they will improve the system and things like this will happen less and less. I’m sorry that happened to you, but it doesn’t mean the idea as a whole is bad.
I read the article second article, the first is paywalled. I still think cameras are a good solution. The argument in the article sounds a lot like “some police are bad, we shoud disband the police” or “some government officials are greedy, we should disband the government”.
Frankly, it sounds like the real issue if that they have privitized the production and configuration of the traffic cameras. If there was legislation in place that ensured fair and consistent implementation of the devices much of the issues identified by the author would be moot.
Any system that we put in place to enforce rules can be abused by those in power, but that doesn’t mean the system is bad or wrong. The reality again is that cars are dangerous, and I argue we should prioritize protecting the public.
It’s easy to hop in a discussion and say “no that’s bad”, but a lot more productive to say “here’s an alternative”.
What you’re describing may be an issue. I suspect it is a tiny minority of the speeding tickets written. The above poster is advocating for well advertised limits and automated ticketing. I think this is a very reasonable solution to an undeniable problem: driving is dangerous, speeding more so.
The situation your describing a contrived edge case and is not a valuable contribution to the discussion at this stage.
“Just don’t speed” is, by and large, a very reasonable thing to ask of drivers.
It’s not a flat tax you clown. Just don’t speed
It costs $0 to not be an asshole
The portal teleports an object to a position in space with high potential energy, while apparently spending no energy of its own. This action creates energy.
By moving an object laterally into the portal falling loop, you would do no work and increase the potential energy of the object to effectively infinity. You would be creating energy.
I think you’re a liar