Please direct me to these ez pz 7.5% returns.
Please direct me to these ez pz 7.5% returns.
Your point is that doing something is more effective than doing nothing? You sure got me there. I have to say that I agree.
My state is nowhere near anywhere close to being a swing-state. My vote for president carries very little weight. For this reason, I vote for whichever party actually aligns with my ideology.
An acquaintance once tried to scapegoat me and my vote for Jill Stein as the reason that Donald Trump won in 2016.
That’s not how the electoral college works.
Your options are wretched vs horrific.
I think what annoys me is the oxymoronicality (is that even a word?) of the whole thing. We’re excited that EVs pollute less. However, we’re choosing a less efficient, more pollution creating, worse version of the new, better thing: The efficient type of power in the body of a gas guzzler.
ICE vehicles are unsustainable. EVs are also unsustainable but they’re a little better. We should strive for even more efficiency and even less pollution.
I should probably just take my attitude back to the “fuck cars” community.
SUV’s with their extra weight, high suspension, and big, inefficient tires definitely take away from the function of an electric vehicle.
Aren’t we all in agreement that the cybertruck is a ridiculous, nonsense, piece of garbage?
Are you going to bring a trailer full of solar panels with you on your EV overlanding adventure? Where do you think you’re going to plug this thing in?
They don’t need off-road capability. They’re just going to drive a needlessly inefficient design to work and the grocery store because they like the way it looks.
Gasoline engines make way more sense for off-road capable vehicles.
The current state of electric vehicle tech is still better suited to vehicles that focus on efficiency.
It seems like you’re putting form before function.
The time capsule also contains a copy of his book, “Swedish made penis enlarger pumps and me. Yes, this sort of thing is my bag, baby”
Don’t be ridiculous. He has a lawnmower in one hand and a chainsaw in the other.
The technologically illiterate pirate is an easy target.
At first, I wasn’t sure where I was supposed to be looking. Thank you red arrow.
I’m still not understanding the part where everyone having an extra 25k for a house purchase doesn’t just increase the price of all houses by 25k. This is what happens when you increase the demand for something without increasing the supply.
My friend, in california, every house costs a million dollars. All this is going to do is bump up the value of a house by 2.5% at the expense of taxpayers. Unless we’re going to massively increase tax on the rich and cut tax for the poor, I don’t see this as a win.
Maybe I’m missing somethng here. I’m not just asking this because I’m upset about the possibility of other people getting money and not me: Wouldn’t we expect the home buyers’ subsidy to only increase demand and drive up the cost of houses? Then the money would end up in the hands of those who already own one or many houses. Isn’t this just giving money to people who are already well-off? Wouldn’t it be better to create a program focused on building more houses instead?
Whatever. I just used a.i. to write my performance evaluation at work. I fed it a bunch of garbled, incoherent nonsense and made me sound productive AF.
If tips are no longer taxed, I’m definitely tipping about 1/3 less. 15-20%? More like 10-13%.
All minimum wage should be tied to inflation.
We already know that cops are incompetent. We would just like it if they weren’t also doing the occasional murder.
Dude, your penis is huge!
gassing?