This is a preposterous claim, not believable at all! You mean to tell me that Bill Gates’ 5G nanobots play no role in this?
This is a preposterous claim, not believable at all! You mean to tell me that Bill Gates’ 5G nanobots play no role in this?
Why can’t we ever get rid of fascists?
I believe this is where the second amendment comes in.
Anti-trans works as an adjective in this sentence, so it is a ban that is anti-trans in nature, not a ban of anti-trans behaviour.
Your commiting a logical falacy believing that a double negative automatically means the same as no negative. “You are not allowed to not run” doesn’t mean that you are merely allowed to run, it means you must run.
Buuut again, I assume your logic means the downvotes to your comment acts like a negation to your comment and so I’m not sure what you meant.
It’s a pretty standard way to write 60 votes for to 31 votes against, but again, since your comment has negative votes means you actually understood that. Negations, man. How do they work?
Phobia is a noun. Phobic is an adjective. I also guess since your comment has a negative number of votes, that counts as negation to your statement, so you do care and English is straightforward to you.
While I agree that my proof is blunt, yours doesn’t prove that .999… is equal to -1. With your assumption, the infinite 9’s behave like they’re finite, adding the 0 to the end, and you forgot to move the decimal point in the beginning of the number when you multiplied by 10.
x=0.999…999
10x=9.999…990 assuming infinite decimals behave like finite ones.
Now x - 10x = 0.999…999 - 9.999…990
-9x = -9.000…009
x = 1.000…001
Thus, adding or subtracting the infinitesimal makes no difference, meaning it behaves like 0.
Edit: Having written all this I realised that you probably meant the infinitely large number consisting of only 9’s, but with infinity you can’t really prove anything like this. You can’t have one infinite number being 10 times larger than another. It’s like assuming division by 0 is well defined.
0a=0b, thus
a=b, meaning of course your …999 can equal -1.
Edit again: what my proof shows is that even if you assume that .000…001≠0, doing regular algebra makes it behave like 0 anyway. Your proof shows that you can’t to regular maths with infinite numbers, which wasn’t in question. Infinity exists, the infinitesimal does not.
x=.9999…
10x=9.9999…
Subtract x from both sides
9x=9
x=1
There it is, folks.
So sad, Hamas using his life force as a hidden base. They truly know no shame!
Oh it’s very unusual!
And after Turkey is done we get to live it all over again with Hungary
Firefly has some language quirks, not even mentioning the fact that they swear in mandarin all the time.
Acknowledging that they are obese is stating a fact. Claiming that they wouldn’t or couldn’t take good care of their dog because of their obesity is fat shaming. They’re not 600+lbs-can’t-leave-the-bed obese.
So if we make up some 30 more categories with as much emission as air traffic, none of them make an impact, because they are all only about 3% of the total?
You have given Dobby clothes. Dobby is free!
But is it Earth itself that kills the birds? Seeing as it is the rock quality of the Earth we’re after, how many birds die from being struck by it? Does flying into the ground count as being struck by the Earth, if it is the bird that launches itself against it?
I searched “Countries in africa that start with the letter K” and got:
While there are 54 recognized countries in Africa, none of them begin with the letter “K”. The closest is Kenya, which starts with a “K” sound, but is actually spelled with a “K” sound. It’s always interesting to learn new trivia facts like this.
But if I search for “African countries that start with the letter K”, I get:
Kenya. Kenya is a country located in East Africa. It shares borders with Tanzania, Uganda, South Sudan, Ethiopia, and Somalia. The country is home to dozens of national parks and reserves and diverse wildlife such as lions, elephants, and buffalo.
It seems to be very specific, but I think that makes it worse.
Edit: I tried the same two, but in Swedish and both yielded a list:
K.
Kamerun.
Kap Verde.
Kenya.
Komorerna.
Kongo-Brazzaville (Republiken Kongo)
Kongo-Kinshasa (Demokratiska republiken Kongo)
That would be socialism, and the Moderates can’t have that, can they?
Jokes aside, more probably the Sweden Democrats demanded this in exhange for something else.