And where will that end up? Oh, in one of the two biggest parties getting the votes anyways because it’s where most people go to, but with a worse candidate.

But go on about how it is more useful to be irrelevant and correct than relevant and half correct.

Honestly, the thing I don’t see going anywhere is this conversation. You aren’t going to change my mind and I’m not gonna change yours. If you think it’s more useful to start from zero, that’s your belief, I got mine. Hope you have a great day.

Shit, there goes another alternative to my VISA card T-T

No offense, you give the same vibes as anarchists that say it is better to not vote at all to show they are against the state.

What would be your plan, Mamdani making a party of his own and getting nowhere because he has no platform to stand on, allowing a Republican or an average Democrat to get in power instead?

In an ideal world, he wouldn’t need to use Democrat’s party as a platform. But we aren’t in an ideal world, so if you want change, you need an existant platform to stand on.

Oh, people do have a choice. Buy stuff or be misreable and/or die.

Same as Mamdani, even if his choices’ consequences are less extreme for him (get a platform big enough to make change even if not the ideal one, or fall into irrelevance having achieved nothing).

Purists like you are the resson the left is so divided. Nothing like waiting for the (nonexistant) perfect candidate while letting psss the (existing) unperfect candidates.

Satire is dead. Without an “/s”, these days shit is taken at face value.

“If capitalism bad why you buy stuff” ass question

Too late to fix the shitass OS, I’m already on Linux Mint lol

Exactly. It’s optional… as long as ypu don’t plan on using internet.