• 0 Posts
  • 211 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 2nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Long range attacks are about knocking out supplies, the ability to produce new supplies, and the ability to get supplies to the front line.

    Say Russia is getting more newly made artillery shells to the front line. The best way to fix this is to blow up the factories.

    If you can’t take out the factories directly, take out components that the factories need to operate: ore processing, fuel refineries, electricity grid, etc.

    The problem is all the critical targets are a long ways from the front line and Ukraine currently has limited capacity to hit them.

    Meanwhile Russia is targeting all of Ukraine’s internal infrastructure constantly.

    Long wars are won by the production capabilities of the groups involved as much as the front line troops.






  • I have been using custom start menus since the whole win8 full screen disaster. Every time I see the default win 10 or Win 11 menu I cringe. So much crap in the way.

    Process optimization reaches a point of diminishing returns. Then if tweaked further it degrades the performance. Microsoft reached the close to the optimal OS design at Win7. It’s all been downhill since then.

    The mobile OS systems are reaching the same point. Optimization has occured and most of the “new” additions degrade the user experience.


  • Large corporations rarely innovate and try new things. Most innovation comes from smaller players with limited market share taking risks.

    Large companies buy out smaller ones who create cash cows from taking large risks. The large company then milks the cash cows until they are completely dead.

    The consolidation of studios to a few megacorporations has led to this inevitable end. The solution is simple: break them up. If we have 30 or so similar sized studios competing, we will get better movies/TV again.



  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyz2 Kinds
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 days ago

    After much debate over copious drinks at the bar, we finally decided to settle the argument with darts.

    0 are all crossed.

    1’s are written as l

    7’s are all crossed.

    And 9’s… Well we got kicked out and it was never settled. How was I supposed to know the nickname Nicky sounds like the French word “Niquer” and somebody (Nicolas) got all bent out of shape over it. “Hey Nicky it’s your turn!” apparently was not well received by a drunk frenchman.





  • The issue with wine is quality control is dependent many factors, weather, fertilizer management, water management, disease pressure, pest pressure, harvest conditions, unpredictable fermentations and the skill of the winemaker. The more variable the conditions the more unpredictable the finished wine product is.

    A good bottle is really tough to make. A mediocre bottle is difficult to make. A poor bottle is what is usually made. I’ve never had an excellent bottle of wine and I think it is a myth. Pricing is mostly unrelated to the quality of the product as well.

    When you usually put out a poor product people tend to avoid it unless there is a cultural expectation of low performance. What’s changing is the cultural acceptance of drinking horrible tasting stuff.

    The wine industry in needs to adapt and put out a better product or else they will go under.



  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPhD Grads
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    No - you missed my direction.

    The paragraph is an overly polite way of writing to avoid any semblance of disparaging the other person. As mine was clearly written as a personal anecdote there is no need to qualify your remarks as non-derogatory.

    Generally I see people develop those types of phrasing habits when they have negative experiences with misunderstanding in the past. Very common with many PhD’s communicating with MBA’s, sales or production teams. A little overly verbose but carefullly respectful to avoid conflict. It’s a very good habit to have professionally but quite funny when out of context.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPhD Grads
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    First paragraph had me laughing. Somebody has spent a lot of time in private industry and has gotten burned a few times.

    As for #2 it depends on the age of the industry. Here is the life cycle of research driven industries as I see it.

    Historically in research driven industries the foundations have been started in academia. Private companies start up relying on the universities research.

    Money flows into the university systems from private companies and they start producing a lot PhD’s in the field.

    Next the private companies decide they can make more money doing the research in-house. They offer large sums of money to the established professors and get fresh grads at bargain prices.

    Pretty soon most of the best and brightest are drained to private industry. The funding from private industry slows to a trickle and all that is left in academia is those with more social connections than ability.

    For the next 30 years, private industry has great talent. Then the first first wave of PhD’s retire. The new PhD’s grads are trained by the social connections crowd.

    That’s when you start to see fun job descriptions posted like:

    PhD + 2 years of experience, Masters + 5 years experience, Bachelor’s + 8 years experience.


  • The_v@lemmy.worldtoScience Memes@mander.xyzPhD Grads
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 days ago

    I spent most of a decade in industry doing what is generally thought of as a PhD’s job. In order to fill in some gaps, I took a ton of graduate classes on the companies dime and looked at doing a fully funded PhD. I didn’t end up doing it.

    Why?

    1. The industry paid better than academia. So the brain drain was real. The informal training I had from PhD’s in the company was vastly superior to the graduate level training at the university. Anyone who was any good at the applied side was not in academia. The ones left in academia were a very odd group with zero applied knowledge.

    2. Most PhD hires failed miserably in the field. 9 out of 10 of them could not make the transition to the practical application of knowledge.

    3. I saw a trend where smaller companies where hiring mostly industry experienced people for the positions (like I was).

    So for me the time and investment was not worth it.

    One of my friends made it halfway through his PhD. He then got sick of the politics and drama and noped out.