Yeah, he’s an illegal immigrant, get it right.

The dialogue was so bad, I don’t think anything would have really helped.

On the lobster?

It is the Democrats fault that there are so many cowardly, weak-minded losers in charge of the party though.

He also knows that ignorance of the law is not a legitimate defense, even if it’s fake ignorance.

Should have released this article yesterday, I did them at midnight.

They quoted you, lol

Christians? They’re pretty baked in to the American system, good luck excising that tumor.

Ross Don for Fewer

I’ve never met a Muslim that wanted to kill three quarters of society, but that’s the only kind of Nazi you could ever possibly meet. It’s kind of their only thing. Tolerance of intolerance only leads to more intolerance. It’s why people who are lactose-intolerant should avoid lactose. Society is, by nature, Nazi-intolerant, Nazis make society shit itself.

They’re not defending their beliefs, they’re defending their right to exist. It’s the same thing they do for Christians and Jews and Buddhists etc etc etc.

See? I told you you wouldn’t get it.

Those people are defending non-extremist Muslims, not all Islam. There’s a huge difference, though I don’t expect you to grasp it based on the general level of ignorance you’ve displayed thus far.

Leftists are largely non-religious, rightists are the religious fanatics.

You’re describing users without basic knowledge.

I’m going to ensure people know they are other options

I haven’t heard of any viable option, so you’ve failed. The only way to accomplish what you want to accomplish, what we all want to accomplish, is to elect enough local politicians that support massive electoral overhaul to disrupt the two party system. FPtP and winner-take-all must go, but we’re never gonna get there by throwing our votes away to unviable third parties. In the meantime, we do the best with what we have and we let logic rule our decisions, not emotion. Try it!

You: “I don’t like these two candidates so I’m going to do everything I can to ensure the worst one wins!”

You’re not trying to plant a tree, you’re trying to burn down the forest.

Your third party vote causes waaaay more damage to “people on these shores” (and on all other “shores”) than any possible direct action could mitigate. Any legal action, anyway.

You’d vote for both of them? That wouldn’t work out well in your favor, they’d just throw the ballot out.

This is pretty big news, I would think it would be relevant in way more than just one article, time to do some updating.