That’s the secret of NIMH

Does it match their prior behavior? Then it’s likely to be true.

Not for every problem, but if you’re physically dangerous there’s not many better solutions. We need preventive measures so fewer people end up in that state, but you can’t prevent away ongoing violence.

Probably because they’re shifting development work to something else. Doing it this way and making it run offline frees up developers.

On Android:

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nintendo.zasa

Have you talked to your therapist about signs that you may be a white dude?

There’s a physics argument that information can’t be destroyed, so in terms of causality it has an effect (see butterfly effect for reference) but because of various physical thresholds like the planck length, general limits on measurement precision (uncertainty principle, resolution limits, detection limits), chaos theory, etc, at one point it becomes indistinguishable noise.

You need to set up a publicly accessible device (in this case the VPS) as your IPv6 gateway

So you set up your VPN connecting your network to the VPS (should probably be set up from the router) and set your router to advertise an IP adress for the VPS which is routable from your local network as the gateway address (and should probably also run DHCPv6 for your network)

(note, I have not set up this stuff myself so I can’t help with implementation details)

Because certainly they don’t think brigades harm communities if they won’t trust mods to set subreddits as private

“we won’t let moderators harm their communities by not letting them eg. protect their communities from brigades and similar harassment”

Sure you thought that through, reddit admins?

Microsoft had a dual screen foldable like that, then stopped supporting it

Human involvement isn’t the rule though. Again, that which ends up in fixed form has to carry expression by a human. Otherwise everything from dirt stains to footprints you accidentally create would be under copyright.

The prompts aren’t generally considered enough because there’s too little control over the final expression, the same prompt can create wildly different outputs.

The rule is already human expression in fixed form, of creative height. So you have to demonstrate that you the human made notable contributions to the final output.

Using stuff like controlnet to manually influence how images are shaped by the ML engine might count, there’s some great examples here (involving custom Qr codes)

https://medium.com/@ssmaameri/ai-generated-qr-codes-with-controlnet-huggingface-and-google-colab-a99ffeee2210

It’s human expression that is protected by copyright. Creative height is the bar.

If you’ve done nothing but press a button there’s often no copyright. Photography involves things like selection of motive, framing, etc. If you just photograph a motive which itself doesn’t have copyright, then what you added through your choices is what you may have copyright of. Using another’s scan of a public domain book might be considered fair use, for example (not much extra expression added by just scanning)

Independent creation is indeed a thing in copyright law. Multiple people photographing the same sunset won’t infringe each other’s copyright, at least not if you don’t intentionally try to copy another’s expression, like actively replicating their framing and edits and more.

Wife guy

Obsession with control, including control over future generations

Concepts of a plan of an assassination

If they win with enough margin there won’t be gridlock

No, this will only lead people without access to Google Play to be forced to get it from somebody who has modified the app to fake the check.