Depends on what “right to exist” means here.
sie/ihr, she/her
🖖🦄🦑⌛🦕🗾🎨🎮
Depends on what “right to exist” means here.
“This is annoying. Fuck those lefties for forcing me to have to deal with this, fOr ThE eNvIrOnMeNt.”
I think it’s a bit concerning that AI has given us a gut reaction to suspect anything slightly unusual to be non-human generated.
Isn’t that convenient.
It was probably yesterday.
Sure. How does that add to the topic at hand?
I don’t see why it would be so unlikely to be cellophane but OP would have to test it.
Okay, and? Are you saying that’s reason for any and all aid deliveries to stop?
Hello everybody all around the world! Wanna join this super duper awesome fun thing? Only if you’re in the US though!
(Not that I’d want to)
You complain a lot about a thing you couldn’t care less about.
Au contraire, mon Capitan, after they’re gone, this will be the place to move TO for the foreseeable future!
Why those two in particular? And why on repeat instead of queueing several different ones? If you don’t mind me being nosy for absolutely no good reason.
just saying “health”,
It’s short for “I wish you good health (and not the plague)”.
“may it be beneficial”
May what be beneficial? In German, “Prosit” (usually “Prost”) is a form of “cheers” or “bottoms up” because that beer better be beneficial or else.
It ain’t your job to keep yourself healthy, it’s the job of the government to keep their citizens healthy.
I live in socialist paradise and I still think that’s a weird, weird thing to say.
Ah yes, wanting social multiple anxiety and partners introversion. I need to get my head checked.
Wait, I thought that just accepted everything? Because if you don’t care about cookies, you’d be fine with anything, no? But “rejecting” cookie banners to me implies rejecting cookies which is different if I’m not mistaken.
What? The original argument was “Just because it exists doesn’t make it good.”, implying that it (click-bait thumbnails) doesn’t necessarily work. To which I said that the fact that it exists means it works. To which you seemed to object by saying that there may be people who have an interest in it existing - like they want it to exist despite it actually not working. I’m confused about what it is you’re saying.
What “interest” would they have to keep it that way if it wasn’t working?
Wealth inequality exists because it works for the people who have the power to control it. In a way, it’s not harmful ENOUGH to change evolutionarily.
I WANT to believe this but I’ve seen too many elephant videos that turned out to be just elephants trained to do a quirky thing for tourists and there’s someone off camera subtly directing them.