• 0 Posts
  • 13 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 6th, 2024

help-circle

  • Kayana@ttrpg.networktoScience Memes@mander.xyzmoms rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    Huh, really? I thought there were slightly more women than men, but maybe that depends on the economies etc.

    As for your second point, yes, exactly. They don’t reproduce. So it doesn’t matter if many men get one wife each, or if a few men get many wives each, the number of pregnancies won’t change, and the number of pregnancy-related deaths won’t change either. So (again), I don’t see how polygyny helps in this situation.


  • Kayana@ttrpg.networktoScience Memes@mander.xyzmoms rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    Edit: This first point was wrong, but the second point still stands.

    Polygyny wouldn’t solve the aforementioned problem if we suppose that the birth rate of men and women is roughly the same. If one man has many wives, some of whom even die, then several other men won’t have any wives.






  • Huh, TIL.

    Regarding your edit, that amount wasn’t the cumulated cost of whatever Limewire were distributing, that would be idiotic indeed; rather the RIAA tried to call for a ruling that somehow those guys were causing $150,000 in damages - per instance. Now the article unfortunately doesn’t state how they possibly tried to justify that number, and I can’t be bothered to research that myself. Another thing that would interest me is how the plaintiff expected them to pay with almost every dollar on Earth.

    So while I don’t think this had anything to do with “lost sales”, I do agree with the possible fines and damage calculations not being fit for any sort of realistic purpose at all.





  • Kayana@ttrpg.networktoMemes@lemmy.mlJust one more lane
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    That may be true for smaller cities, but in bigger cities it becomes impossible, because there just isn’t enough space to house all the people near areas of interest. Cars don’t factor in there at all. Give me a subway for the major areas, and perhaps a tram or bus system so you don’t need that many subway stations in the residential areas, and you can have car-free city centers.


  • Kayana@ttrpg.networktoMemes@lemmy.mlJust one more lane
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    I don’t really like including pedestrians in there. Like sure, you can fit a bunch of people in a small area, but another point you shouldn’t ignore is the throughput over time, and pedestrians are by their nature rather slow. Obviously if you’re looking at shopping in a street lined by shops left and right, then that street becomes tailor-made for pedestrian traffic (and nothing else except perhaps bicycles). But public transport is much better suited for travelling any further distances, and that should be the main focus when deciding to ditch cars.