JonEFive

I like how the headline has to say that it was an undocumented immigrant. We can see which direction this source leans.

That agent illegally and maliciously ran over a fleeing person. That person’s immigration status is irrelevant.

And that’s why everything is supposed to be labeled.

How on earth were no fines issued? At the very least, the restaurant deserves a slap on the wrist. People were injured by a careless mistake.

Dude, I’ve argued with my microwave and it isn’t even smart.

I could see thinking geographically and saying something like Cuba, but Ohio? That’s a new level of disconnection from reality.

He’s also talked about pardoning himself. The constitution doesn’t specifically forbid that, but it’s never been tried. If he tried, there would be a supreme court challenge, and they’re likey to side with him since that’s what they do most of the time now.

It was never anticipated that the voting public would ever tollerate let alone support this kind of corruption across all three branches of our government.

It isn’t. That’s the whole point of the pardon. It was just never imagined that pardons would be used the way they are today. Oh and SCOTUS’ godawful ruling on executive immunity.

That’s more because they were obviously fishing for something new or different to catch him on. There was no reason to bring him back before congress at this point. It was pure theater.

If he purjures himself, intentionally or not, by saying anything that conflicts with previous statements, they’d try to charge him. There was zero benefit to Fauci to testify in that hearing, only legal peril.

You know Vance said that openly, right?

“I think that his historical legacy is enjoying a bit of a renaissance — but I think deservedly so,” Vance said of Nixon. “As I joked … backstage, if Watergate happened tomorrow, it would be like a 12-hour news story. Like, the idea that it would have taken down a presidency is crazy.”

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/26/politics/jd-vance-richard-nixon-corruption

That explains Trump supporters

They’ve shifted their arguments to being against children recieving gender affirming care. They’re saying that minors can’t decide for themselves, and parents who allow it are harming their children.

Adults can do what they want except use the bathroom or play sports apparently.