Yes

I mean programming in methods of anti-perving the camera view have been common in games for decades now.

Hermes the giant killer?

While David Brevik did move to GGG, he is not a dev there. He is an “advisor” and was originally hired to oversee their product exportation to China. Now GGG founded their company making games on the D2 engine, and were big fans of it, but I am pretty sure Brevik is the only D2 team member that went over, and he isn’t a dev there, at least not fully.

No, while the best schools in the country have done a lot to incorporate non-traditional educational tools, like Khan Academy, have changed the class time structure, have moved to more “hands on” methods of communicating ideas, and have been moving away from a dependence on rote cram/purge cycles, they will not be scrapping down time, and forcing kids to do things they think are boring. Instead they have more per capita resources to tutor kids on how to deal with their frustrations, scheduling, boredom, and doing things they don’t like, because they have to. They actually have people that will work 1 on 1 with kids to do this, or their parents will hire private tutors to work with them on that, and subjects they struggle with. However, they know that cutting it out isn’t the solution, it is to specifically teach the kids how to deal with it.

This will end well

They either fail to realize that the avatar is to maintain anonymity, while giving people a personable figure to watch, or they are just one of those people who don’t like it due to personal preferences, and want to sound like they have a better reason than that.

According to a lot of people? No.

If by stunt you mean, “discusses how the character has been set-up as the natural replacement with games media interviewer”… then sure, stunt.

Heh, It wasn’t world, I bailed there when I saw they banned others for telling people to jury nullify luigi’s case. It was on an account I mostly use for NSFW content, which was not the account I expected to get a ban for political speech.

Cool, I know being a mod sucks, used to do it when I was younger. Just, have had my comments that corpos, having spent decades, and billions, destroying any civil means of change, will mean they will suffer violence for it, get me banned on an instance.

I know from experience some mods don’t see the difference. Which is why I asked.

Would discussion of the break down of the efficacy of civil venues for change, leading to this kind of violence, as an outcome of their own actions, be acceptable?

but then we wouldn’t be defeating the whining about water battleships and the horizon

Just make a hovering AWACS that can hold U2 elevation. Then the gunship could hit targets across the pacific.

Until the USSC decides that since congress can hold securities in investments they legislate the industry for, then appointees should be able to do the same.

We shall see, I guess

we shall see, he has been pledging to, essentially, make police legally invincible. He says a lot of things though, however, based on his own personality, this seems like something he would push for.

Yes, and the people, like Fuentes, who support it, and want it to be worse, should experience the thing they desire for others.