This is a joke about Einstein’s form of the Equivalence Principle:
This is a joke about Einstein’s form of the Equivalence Principle:
Rule number one: the kids are alright.
Well, there is a market in people who think their city has gone to hell all because of… those people. They’ll eat this shit up.
The best time was 100 years ago. The second-best time is now.
Project 2025+4n.
Hey I’ve seen this movie before… https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_and_the_Holocaust
100%
So 0.0001 of global CO2 emissions (2022 global total) Who might be bigger and what should we do about them?
I guess the Talking Heads were on to something. https://youtu.be/PH5JvU19_YQ?si=gqbkXoBWCngdkCpV
A sign that reflects the eternal truth… You don’t buy beer. You rent it.
It’s because they would charge you for air if they could.
The paper explicitly states that they are calling ChatGPT “bullshit” in the Frankfurtian sense and they cite “On Bullshit” as the source for that definition. It’s right there in the introduction.
You’d know this if you had read the paper or even checked whether your statement were true. So either you read it and then lied deliberately, or you didn’t read the paper nor actually care about the truth value of your own statement, rendering your comment itself bullshit in the Frankfurtian sense.
He’s talking about things happening with pace rather than speed, so…
America First, you gotta do the truffle shuffle.
Or maybe it’s a ploy to help factions friendly to Russia rise to power in countries that currently support Ukraine.
If an isolationist faction can pretend that Russia made a good faith bid to end the war, they can paint continued support of Ukraine as adventurism and a waste of money.
It doesn’t have to be true. It just needs to be close enough to rhyme with the misgivings of folks that don’t want to spend their tax dollars helping Ukraine fight.
What a savings.
deleted by creator
They always wanted Jesus to send them a sign. They didn’t expect it to say “STOP”.
If by people you mean “people-flavored slurry”, sure.
There’s no evidence it’s quiltists. That kind of blanket statement has no place in this debate. It could be someone else trying to fleece investors before they cotton on.