The only things that come to mind are anonymity and performance on very old hardware.

My best experiences have to be the GNOME workflow and the startup time of Void Linux.

Wasn’t it dead?

Wait I thought we were on beta 2!

Deepin is quite beautiful but I don’t think it has that much customization.

In terms of DEs nothing comes close to KDE.

That’s a good point but Fedora is doing it in a not so clear way. They have to tell that the packages are unofficial.

Afaik battery drain is very bad when using apps through Waydroid.

Even though putting AI anywhere is a terrible decision, I think Fedora is the best place for it in terms of Linux distros. You need quite up to date packages to work with AI efficiently and some stability too.

You don’t like the exclusion of Russian developers?

I indeed do not. Any bias in development always hurts the quality of the project and reduces security.

I think it was fine before 2024. Last year Linus made a geopolitical decision and I think there was another incident but I can’t remember it now. Because of that I consider using custom kernels without such issues generally better.

The mainstream kernel is pretty evil now imo.

I think it’s good tbh.

Yea something like that is the only way nowadays.

Yea I’m definitely getting warned for going offtopic here. Though I suspect I’m always the only one, even when the other person starts it. That’s another issue of Lemmy and Mastodon.

Close.

Well fyi I am proud of my opinions so why wouldn’t I?

Well Facebook is the only platform to allow my political opinions so I do have a sweet spot in my heart for it. But the decision is weird indeed.

I saw some cheap laptops with Ubuntu in a local mall and on them the latency on Wayland was unbearable.

Well a lot of stuff for Linux is reverse engineered and some is just copied (WindowsFX, ElementaryOS etc). Kali Linux is also a thing.