Unfortunately, as you can see, you are in a crowd of liars. Now, I am certainly not accusing you personally of being dishonest, but it does tend to bias your audience against you. Sorry.

The numbers aren’t particularly bad. It’s not for nothing that the EU has classified natural gas as green energy.

Renewable energy makes good progress, but as you can see here, many people have other priorities.

It’s not hard to look up. If you need help, ask for help politely.

I said “leftist” in quotes. Almost everyone here self-identifies as being on the left, at least insofar as they oppose Trump. And yet… well.

I am skeptical if AI is already having a substantial effect on employment. In any case, I don’t think these people care. You don’t see anyone arguing for a better social safety net/unemployment benefits. Here’s someone saying that people lose their jobs over AI, but you also have people saying AI is useless. They really don’t care.

Look at the comments here. Do you think the haters here care?

Yes. Trump’s deranged acts are seriously harming the US economy but also doing a lot of damage to the global economy. Anyone who blames AI for layoffs is effectively helping Trump/the global right by covering up their incompetence and failure. To be fair, Putin’s war is also causing much harm.

fighting against something you see as a danger to literally the entire world

Is that what you’re doing, then?

Unfortunately, having a god complex is not sufficient to make one a good coder.

It’s pretty insignificant compared to the rest of the economy. Focusing on AI to the exclusion of bigger issues is actively harmful.

Sure bro. All dumb takes by GrapheneOS, LineageOS, and even Linux.

You understand quality code, unlike Linus Torvalds.

Oh look! Another “leftist” trying to shift blame away from tariff man.

Eric Lu has published a write-up of how he did it: https://cognition.com/blog/factoring-rsa-260

In total, I estimate that this factorization cost about 4,900 GPU-days, or 13.5 GPU-years, which is about $400k at current market prices.

They are certainly not reading everyone’s mail from back in the day.

A large number of people are using it as an opportunity to promote using operating systems which are the direct opposite of hardened and are much more heavily using AI models including for a lot of code generation.

LineageOS is certainly using it. CalyxOS, /e/ and iodéOS are based on it. CalyxOS is developed by LineageOS core developers.

https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/117243278117231129

You’re right, but don’t encourage people to brigade GrapheneOS. That’s a donation-funded project.

I’ll grant that bosses and managers have a valid role for keeping the work on track. But someone who tries that without being qualified themself will cause major problems.

I guess many people don’t know how much programming has changed over the last year. GrapheneOS is doing a good job telling it like it is.

Luckily, the “negative externalities” are mostly made-up bullshit.

There is really no point arguing about such details. AI haters don’t care how exactly you use AI. If you want the best, most secure software possible, you need to let the developers find whatever way there. Imposing arbitrary restrictions won’t work.

I’m trying to figure out which model they used based on the style of the UI, but I can’t quite pin it down.

Looks like ARC-AGI 3 is just about saturated. Womp Womp