I’d assume that using the service without paying (money or otherwise) for it would introduce costs to the provider hence being worse than not using it at all.
Google Services Framework if I recall correctly
I’m damn sure our definitions of this word are not aligned
That would force them to reveal it’s sources (unconsented scraping) hence make them liable for any potential lawsuits. As such they would need to withdraw from revealing sources
Depends on what you did! Say for example they’re using Graphene to harass/paedophilia then they already have a copious amount of evidence on hand since they are there.
For organising peaceful protests that seems less of an issue and the other end of the chats is the weak link.
Good luck having them delete your data cuz they didn’t delete mine.
Tracking how many users you have and how many of them visit an article is hardly any breach of privacy compared to what ad companies retain.
Use an open source solution about analytics and minimise data collection if not absolutely necessary.
The developer was threatened with legal action I last read so he was forced to takedown.
I fail to understand if a slap on the wrist is enough to defer these kids from the cookie. Legislation needs to be passed and a no second strike policy implemented where you lose the licence in the event they are found to be illegally serving any parties.
Hats off to a wingman like yourself.
A compilation of people using uBlock for the first time would be hilarious
I’ve started to get annoyed at people asking why I cannot be found on this or that social platform! I have given up on explaining and simply tell them I took an irreversible decision to do so and leave them in the dark as to why
deleted by creator