AwesomeLowlander

https://annas-archive.org/md5/c2888f16d2436bffc6ac7c52de6a7e1a

Oh yes, no argument there. That’s my entire point, in fact.

Warning: Unpopular opinion coming up

This is a ridiculous metric. They measure carbon emissions not just by what the billionaires are consuming, but by what their investments (businesses, factories, etc) are producing. This is akin to the world blaming China for their grossly inflated per capita emissions, while conveniently ignoring that it’s actually being consumed by other countries and it’s just shifting numbers around.

There are plenty of legit reasons to hate billionaires, there’s really no need to be making up new questionable ones that can be torn apart.

Steam DRM doesn’t have quite the same history of maliciousness towards end users that Denuvo does

What makes you think he’s an idiot as opposed to lying through his teeth?

- ‘It’s difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on not understanding it’

By the same logic however, mods would have no power to actually moderate. Their moderation ability is directly proportional to their potential for abuse. And I think we can all agree we’ve long passed the point where communities are able to survive without moderation, at least in their current form (which is what OP is discussing).

Malaysian.

If you’re going to remove 90% of the content on lemmy, is there even a point staying on it?

I hope she actually liked the outfit. She looks kinda uncertain

I said EU, not UK. But it turns out they ARE licensed in the UK as well.

https://fortune.com/europe/2024/07/25/revolut-secures-long-awaited-banking-license-after-3-yearsa-move-that-will-position-the-firm-to-rival-banking-giants-hsbc-barclays-monzo/

Revolut should be watching for suspicious transactions and blocking them like proper banks are required to do.

There’s nothing in the article to indicate this isn’t already the case. No suspicious activity algorithm will be foolproof. Also, revolut is certified as an actual bank in the EU, and subject to the standard bank regulations.

All I’m reading in this article is stupid people who don’t follow basic security practices. Why is any of this Revolut’s fault?

It’s a standard YouTube video, what are you going on about?

The autistic part is literally in the article and was brought up during the defense

Really shitty scaremongering article. I’d like to know how exactly increased investment in fusion could potentially make it unsuitable for public use, as the article claims?

That helps somewhat, but if the house gets demolished with a bulldozer that’s still a lot of asbestos floating around again. The point is, you don’t know what will happen to it in the future, and it’s just not safe to have semi hazardous material lying around everywhere.

Yeah no, there’s plenty of .ml users who have no idea of the political leanings of the server, I agree. Which is why I made it very clear I was kidding. I’m still keeping the instance blocked though.

Can I just downvote them anyway for being from .ml? (kidding)

I’m pretty sure we could go back to using it, with more precautions in place, better binders, etc. Hell, it’s still used in many parts

Is there a way to keep it inert when the next homeowner starts tearing down drywall and drilling holes in stuff?

For all intents and purposes, (…) as close to a real person as technology can create.

Again, I point you towards video games and how they got blamed for violence. You could have used the same statement about them 20 years ago.