• WrenFeathers@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Under certain conditions, and it still poses a risk as the proper labeling of it suggests.

    The NLH has some literature on the unnecessary amount of people that are made sick, and some that have died as a result of consuming raw milk.

    Take a look.

    If you want to believe it’s harmless, and consume it despite warnings, you are free to do so. But I can’t in good conscience allow you to misinform people without due diligence. Now everyone can weigh the risks after having been given both sides of the argument.

      • 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        What’s the point though. I don’t eat raw meat or raw eggs so why would I eat raw milk. If it contains protein and fat then my nutritional needs are satisfied - simple as that really

        • Jamablaya@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          The opinion of a person apparently never had steak tartar, sashimi, met, whisky sours made properly, or eggs over easy is pretty much worthless.

          • 000999@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I eat fried eggs over easy most days of the week. I’ve had sushi and sashimi multiple times. Never had steak tartar and I don’t drink anymore though.

            Haven’t heard of runny egg yolk posing the same risk of containing harmful bacteria as raw milk.

            Steak tartar and sushi fish have to come from certified producers as far as i know. Surely raw milk is the same.

            But I doubt anyone eats those things every day of the week, throughout the day, like they do with milk.