1.8 Million Barrels of Oil a Day Avoided from Electric Vehicles::Sign up for daily news updates from CleanTechnica on email. Or follow us on Google News! We love covering electric … [continued]

    • Metype @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’ll take a bike over a car any day, but for people who were going to drive? An electric vehicle will save oil usage over an ICE one.

      • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        My Bolt EUV uses automatic transmission fluid in the transfer case to reduce the RPMs of the motor to the wheels. Traditionally ATF is refined from crude, but you can use a synthetic replacement. As far as I know it doesn’t have any grease fittings either, so it’s all sealed in on bearings and the like. Don’t get me wrong though, it’s a massive reduction in petroleum usage though.

        • dgmib@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s helpful to remember too that the problem isn’t using petroleum, the problem is burning it.

          As long as it’s properly disposed of using petroleum based lubricant doesn’t cause climate change.

          • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            Exactly, and petroleum really is a wonder material, it has so many amazing uses besides burning it but instead we decide to do the absolute worst thing with almost all of it

      • Pretzilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        31.5 gallons in a barrel so your math shows 15Mbbl saved

        Article says 1.8Mbbl

        I’m missing the discrepancy

          • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            While 55 gal drums are the standard physical barrel, barrels as used for oil are their own unit, and oil is rarely in actual physical barrels anymore anyways. It’s weird, but it’s how the oil industry measures it.

        • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          Me probably, I don’t usually have to fill up my 15-gallon tank more than once a month. I don’t have to drive a lot and my car gets 30mpg when I do.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I am about that. Only use my car for work and picking up kids from aftercare. I would cycle to work but there is a highway that breaks my route.

      • aͮͫͨ͋ͤͣ͌̏lex͒̃ͪ̃ͨ͛́͂ͪ͗̏ͫͮ̂@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Oh this is so fucking typical. “EV” or electric vehicles never means e-bikes when it would benefit e-bikes (for example, EV subsidies = electric car subsidies) but when it conveniently makes electric cars look better, oh look an e-bike is an EV! 😒

        • HaoBianTai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Isn’t this article very clearly referring to Asian adoption of scooters, not a bunch of New Yorkers on e-bikes?

            • HaoBianTai@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              I mean, yes? You’re whining about US decision making around subsidies using a portion of the article discussing electric scooters in places like Taiwan. These are different continents and different vehicle types.

              A $500 subsidy on electric bicycles would not get Americans out of their cars and onto a bicycle, but it might make cyclists move to electric bikes, which wouldn’t be a behavioral change that would impact anything relevant to this study.

              I’m on your side, I wish my commute was only a couple miles. I’d ride a bicycle, and I’ve considered electric motorcycles. But you’re barking up the wrong tree, “price” is not what’s keeping Americans off of bicycles, electric or otherwise.

              • adrian783@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                A $500 subsidy on electric bicycles would not get Americans out of their cars and onto a bicycle, but it might make cyclists move to electric bikes, which wouldn’t be a behavioral change that would impact anything relevant to this study.

                why would you think that? I think you’re wrong and price is a big factor. cyclists are unlikely to move to ebike because they can already make it work on a regular bike.

      • poopkins@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        Strange that the parent comment is downvoted for highlighting the fact that electric bikes (and scooters & trikes) continue to make more of an impact.

        For me personally, since I got my electric bike 2 years ago, I use it at least 90% of the time to commute to work (unless the weather is too miserable).

          • poopkins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Oh I’d have to check about the stats. I’m in Switzerland, where I use a Winora Tria 8 and usually carry along just above the electrical assistance (unless I go up a mountain), which caps out at 25 km/h.

    • jumpinjesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yeah which is always weird. How many of those people weren’t just riding normal bikes before vs downsizing from a car. I’m on my 3rd EV and would love to bike if it were an option where I live, but if I went with a bike, I’d just be replacing another EV.

      • astropenguin5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        Assuming you could feasibly bike, it would probably still be environmentally better to use the bike, mostly because it is more energy efficient at moving a single human places because it doesn’t have to move a whole car frame, and in most places a fair amount of power is still from fossil fuels, so less would be needed. Also the other benefits of biking.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’d love one! By fuck me, I clicked a Lemmy link earlier and it was $7,000 USD. Did you want gears with that? Another $1,300.

      All for a bike that won’t hit 40mph, which is hella dangerous on the open road. Couldn’t move out of danger fast enough. Had a 150cc scooter, never again, 250cc or bust.

      But still, a gas scooter burns so little gas, I’d forget to look at the tank, had no idea what gas cost at the time.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          11 months ago

          Chicken and egg problem for sure. I’ve been trying to convince my community/towns to try to build dedicated safe bike infrastructure for neighborhoods to schools at least. With the hope this can expand from there (plus more people just used to riding bikes!).

        • shalafi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          That would be great! But I doubt anyone wants to put the $$$ into building a 30-mile bike lane on a rural highway out to my camp in the swamp. And that’s about the only place I go that really uses gasoline.

          We don’t all live in cities, and some like me, find the idea appalling. (Been there, done that my whole life.) I’m quite happy on the very edge of town, where’s there are plenty of rivers, woods, creeks, trails and swamps to explore. But I just can’t safely bike to those places.

          • cooopsspace@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Obligatory “your 1% edge case doesn’t invalidate the point” comment.

            Many many many many people could bike if there was infrastructure.

            Again - it’s not a once size fits all solution. But you should still advocate for better bike infrastructure where applicable.

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            11 months ago

            There’s a lot of FuckCars people who ask for too much. We don’t need to go completely car-less, and that’s an unattainable goal for a lot of reasons.

            Most US cities have <5% of people using bikes as their main commute method, and around 20-30% doing work from home. What can we do to get to 20% of commuters on a bike while maintaining WFH numbers? That alone would be transformative. Tons of cars off the road, and enough bike usage to demand city councils dedicate more to bike infrastructure.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        $7k for an ebike? There are tons of good options for <$2000. Hell, you can get budget models on Amazon for around $300.

        And most cities have bike lanes on city streets for a reason. However, if you need to commute to work that requires you traversing a highway, then yeah, ebikes are definitely not the solution for you.

        • maynarkh@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          When I lived in Eastern Europe, I bought a foldable E-bike for the equivalent of 500 USD from Decathlon.

          My commute was 10km one-way. It was better than the bus. The thing still runs after 2 years of intense use and 2 years of complete neglect.

      • arthurpizza@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s like claiming cars are too expensive because you can’t afford a Tesla.

        I bought a wonderful ebike from REI for $1,300. You don’t need to buy the fancy luxury models.

      • RaoulDook@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I just bought an E-bike with 40+ mile range for $275. 750W motor and 15Ah 48v battery bike with 7 gears, lights, an LCD, a cargo rack, and fat tires.

        It was a good sale

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I converted a bike I bought off Craigslist for $200 plus an $850 Bafang kit off AliExpress. Didn’t have any experience with bike maintenance beforehand, but did have access to a makerspace with a full bike bench (there’s some specialized tools for pulling things out). Didn’t have it completely working before winter hit–works as a bike, but the motor assist isn’t kicking in for some reason–but I still think it’s an option most people could pull off.