Joker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agoEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksexternal-linkmessage-square55fedilinkarrow-up1701arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up1694arrow-down1external-linkEvil company vs artistsh.itjust.worksJoker@sh.itjust.works to People Twitter@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square55fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down3·1 day agoI’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
minus-squareWhelks_chance@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoIf they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
minus-squareangrystego@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·20 hours agoThe point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
minus-squarezaph@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agoIt makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
minus-squarepuppycat@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agodude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao
I’m not asserting anything, I was asking why he was asserting that it was definitively vandalism lol
If they had paid for use of the wall it would be very easy for them to prove it’s not vandalism. They’ve never said they had permission, that I’m aware of. Can you link to them saying they do?
The point is we don’t know, so we can’t be sure it’s vandalism. We just don’t know.
It makes money to have a famous artist give them free art
dude. as I just said im literally not trying to make a point, I don’t care enough to find a link or whatever. please get off my booty cheeks lmao