On more than 30 occasions, the United Nations Assembly has discussed the blockade against Cuba, which costs the island 5 billion dollars annually, according to some estimates. Every year the resolution is proposed and the whole world, through the vote of the absolute majority of the member countries of the United Nations General Assembly, has condemned the imperialist attitude of the United States towards Cuba.

  • LovableSidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Blockading Cuba has never made sense. If communism is an inferior failed system that can’t compete with the freedom of Capitalism (cue heavenly sunbeams and angel choirs) why not leave Cuba alone and let nature take its course?

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 minutes ago

      This is why you get conspiracy theories that it was Cuba that assassinated President Kennedy: how else can we justify such extended sanctions when all the participants are long gone

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Noted socialist (/s) Hillary Clinton advocated for that very thing.

      The real reason behind the embargo at this point is that it makes a small but important voting bloc of Cuban expats in Florida happy.

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That’s really it. The start and end of why the embargo is even still there. It hurts both Cuba and (to a lesser extent) the United States. It benefits nobody, but there’s some loudmouth Cuban expats who want you to believe Batista didn’t have it coming.