Something tells me the data that is coming from satellitemap.space is very accurate especially since the NOAA has a lot of job openings now.
Something tells me the data that is coming from satellitemap.space is very accurate especially since the NOAA has a lot of job openings now.
More than this, because this loss rate is designed for. The constellation is at a very low altitude and is intended to be constantly replaced like this.
Well it won’t work out very well when they already have less than 15% of the subscribers they thought they would have by now.
And yet they are already profitable.
How does the company stay afloat when they’re constantly replacing satellites? The money, the logistics, and most of all, the materials. What a waste.
Because they launch them in large batches using a reusable rocket, so it doesn’t actually cost much. They did work out the economics of Starlink before they started building the system.
When they worked out those details they also thought they would have 20,000,000 subscribers before now and not just 2,000,000
They are nevertheless already profitable, and they haven’t even begun using Starship to launch satellites yet.
All that sweet gov’t funding doesn’t hurt the bottom line.
There are government users among their customers, yes. Customers are customers. Is this supposed to be a negative?
A requirement for posting here is being obsessed with raging over Elon Musk. I think everyone got kinda bored of raging over Trump every 5 minutes so they found a new bandwagon