I find it odd there has been very little noise about this. Like sweet its awesome to see that there is a new Counter strike and the features they are adding seem awesome. People were very angry when Blizzard did this same exact thing, where is the anger right now about this?

I’m not here to say Valve should forever support their games, its just seems weird to kill it when there are fundamental differences between the games. Kill the official servers, that is fine since the community will just adjust and host their own servers but basically zapping the game out of existence seems wrong and it continues the worrying trends we have that can revolve around game preservation.

  • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    OW2 PvE was never going to be free, and whether people find whatever mode was added fun or not should not matter.

    Dota 2 changed their engine and that was handled in an update, we didn’t get Dota 3.

    You do however have a point with previous CSGO versions still being accessible, if that still works.

    • Entropy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      OW2 PvE was 100% originally going to be free, then they cancelled it outright and only brought it back when the community spoke up about it, but now for a price. But yeah, as far as I’m aware CS:GO is still available so unlike OW2, you don’t like the new one, you don’t have to play it, you still habe options. Another commenter posted the how to if that’s something you’re interested in.

      edit: also as far as I’m aware, Dota 2’s engine update was just a graphical update, they didn’t change anything fundamental to the game. As I said before the difference between CS:GO or CS2 is night and day, they changed a lot.

      Edit 2: also I think it’s a little disingenuous to imply that the quality of a game mode that people now have to pay for doesn’t matter

      • Poopfeast420@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you search for results before the OW2 PvP release last year, you’ll find a bunch of articles and comments, that say PvP is free, PvE is going to cost money.

        You said repeatedly, that the engine changes between CSGO and CS2 are night and day, and I’m not disputing that. I just think, going from 6v6 to 5v5, reworking and rebalancing heroes to accommodate that, is also a night and day difference.

        When I was talking about how the quality of a game mode shouldn’t matter in this discussion, I meant only when comparing the “name changes” for OW2 and CS2, and if a game “deserves” to be called a sequel.

        • Entropy@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Fair points I suppose. Tho I think the real game changer here is that CS:GO is still available, while the original OW is not, thus making all other points moot. If I don’t think that CS2 deserved to be a full on sequel instead of an update and would rather keep playing CS:GO, nothing is stopping you. I think that’s why Valve “got away with it” as you put it. They haven’t forced the new changes on anyone like Blizzard did. Players still have a choice.