FederateLOL
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago

AOC Says Climate Movement Must Become 'Too Big and Too Radical to Ignore'

www.commondreams.org

external-link
message-square
85
fedilink
970
external-link

AOC Says Climate Movement Must Become 'Too Big and Too Radical to Ignore'

www.commondreams.org

silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · 2 years ago
message-square
85
fedilink
  • Gazumi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Meanwhile, here in the UK, Ministers consider rollback of green policy to try to win votes from those who really should not vote Tory.

    • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 years ago

      Term based politics really make me struggle with democracy when it comes to this topic. No one is going to do jack shit if that means they lose votes, or half assed shit at best.

      • Gabu@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s why candidates should be randomized

        • Demuniac@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          You would just make it a lottery.

          • cerement@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 years ago

            sortition

            • Demuniac@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Sounds interesting. Isn’t it quite complicated to implement in a society like ours? How do you choose the pool of people?

        • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          That’s probably the dumbest suggestions I’ve heard (so far). Bravo.

          • Gabu@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            It’s a legitimate democratic system. You should probably inform yourself before having an opinion

            • DarkThoughts@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              That’s a lottery. I’m not going to leave the fate of my country to chance.

    • MartinXYZ@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Aren’t you glad, the EU isn’t there to regulate this kind of thing anymore? /s (do we use the sarcasm “/s” here as well or did we leave that at the old place?)

      • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        WE DO NOT USE THE /S

        We use comprehension

        • IHaveTwoCows@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 years ago

          There’s still quite a few stragglers here that fail at comprehension, just for the record

          • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            MORE REASON NOT TO USE THE /S

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.net

climate@slrpnk.net

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 419 users / day
  • 2.05K users / week
  • 4.01K users / month
  • 9.99K users / 6 months
  • 1 local subscriber
  • 6.56K subscribers
  • 7.6K Posts
  • 33K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • silence7@slrpnk.net
  • BE: 0.19.8
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org