• pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I appreciate the poster sharing the article to multiple communities/instances, but would be nice if the Lemmy front-end could batch these (maybe with a link like “appears in a@b, b@b, c@a …”) if the user + link + title all hashed out to the same thing.

  • Voyajer@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There are a couple of users I recognize just because of the amount of duplicate/triplicate/quadruplicate posts I see from them, often times grouped up like that too.

    • pizzaboi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Which… Why? There’s no karma to farm here, just post it once and let the conversation happen there.

      No offense to anyone, but I’m down voting duplicates to try to stop this shit.

      • 👁️👄👁️@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because there’s more then one community of the same topic. They’re actually doing a really good thing, they’re trying to grow multiple communities. It’s not karma farming here, it’s supporting communities. That is much preferably then people only submitting to the biggest community and create more centralization.

        • luciferofastora@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          The whole point of making a federated network of independent instances is to avoid the issues arising with one central instance, right? Putting the content out to multiple instances plays into that: If it’s important content, no single authority can easily censor it, and the loss of a single instance won’t erase it.

          If it’s trash, of course, every community in every instance you post it to will have to clean it up separately. Arguably, that puts more strain on the respective moderation teams, but if (ideally) those are disjunct people (again, to avoid the issues of a single authority), the strain should be distributed.

          And on the plus side, it would enable each community (in the lemmy sense) to enforce their own nuanced rules, additionally leading to slightly more choice between the types of moderation you favour (as opposed to “There’s one big sub, take it or leave it”).

          Individual communities may be smaller, but maybe some more form of coordination of similar communities across instances could amend that (like linking to the other communities in your sidebar etc.).

          I could also imagine a super-community solution that would allow you to aggregate several communities across instances similar to multireddits. I’m new here, so I’m not sure if that exists, nor have I given the implementation any thought, but I suppose that could be convenient.

  • Chozo@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I suggested an idea to fix this, that I called “thread entanglement”. I had suggested it for Kbin specifically, before, but honestly the base Lemmy software could use something like this. I’d love to see some sort of smart merging of duplicate threads like this be possible.

  • 7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Keep in mind you can always block communities you’re not interested in to prevent them from appearing in any feed. I’ve already blocked plenty of communities to make the “All” post list digestable.

    • Delphia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can also block users, which is super helpful with people that go on crossposting rampages.