• gk99@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Genuinely, I would.

        If only they appealed to me as a consumer at all. If I want to play it, I have an Xbox and it’s much cheaper on there. What I really wanted was a PC port, which they didn’t launch. Instead, because of the Switch port, not only am I not paying them, I’m just slightly more likely to pirate it and emulate if I ever get the hankering to play.

        I would’ve paid $50 for a PC port on Steam.

        • echo@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          these damn fools porting it to the two most popular platforms instead of the one you in particular wanted. they should fire whoever made that choice smh

          • gk99@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, yes? People have been waiting on this game for 13 years and PC has only gotten more popular since. Rather than do the three most popular platforms that the game isn’t on, they did two. If they’ve managed to port it to the Nintendo Switch of all things, they can spit out a half-baked PC port.

            I mean you can ignore the slew of other older games getting ported to PC over the years, be it the Xbox exclusives, PlayStation exclusives, Capcom console exclusives (Dragons Dogma, Dead Rising, Devil May Cry), absolutely countless numbers of JRPGs and similar, and more, but that doesn’t make me the ignorant one.

  • oopsallnaps@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Considering the stories of the code base being an absolute mess, I can see how there might be a floor in what they can charge due to the labour cost of making it functional on PS4 and Switch. Even if the port is the barest of bones, or even a hot mess.

    At least it will make it easier to emulate on Linux 😄

    • NecessaryWeevil@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      No one is saying that it should be free. The issue is that $50 for a straight port of a 13 year-old game is ridiculous when Sony’s competitor offers free backwards compatibility—and 4K upscaling. Microsoft absorbed their expenses for that as the cost of doing business, and it would be a blip on Rockstar’s balance sheet as well, since they make a perpetual avalanche of money from GTA Online. There’s really no credible justification for a price this high.

      • phillaholic@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Microsoft only did that because their first party output over the last decade was embarrassingly bad.

  • Storksforlegs@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It’s my all time favourite game and $29 is the max I would pay for a switch port. I guess I will wait for sales.

    A remastered Steam edition, however…