cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/4249593

Democratic Gov. Jared Polis called the Gadsden flag ‘a proud symbol of the American revolution’ after a a Colorado student was told to remove a patch of the “Don’t Tread on Me” flag from his backpack.

    • xerazal@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I was pointing out why people asked him to take the patch off… because it has a bad rep and why it has a bad rep.

      • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s like asking a Hindu to remove a swastika just because the Nazis gave it a bad rep while ignoring all its lore and significance to dharmic religions

        • xerazal@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          The straw grabbing is getting desperate here.

          I’m not for banning the glasden flag, I’ve said that multiple times. They asked him to take off the patch because of the unfortunate adoption by an authoritarian, violent movement. They didn’t throw him in the gulag, they didn’t expel him, etc. They told him to take it off, that’s all.

          Istfg you people are making a bigger deal out of this than needed.

          • diprount_tomato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, and my example is about the exact same thing. I never said they’d “send him to a gulag” just that they’d ban it by “asking him to remove it”

            • xerazal@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I didn’t realize the glasden flag was a religious symbol used by many different countries and cultures. Oh wait, it’s not…

              Also if your definition of ban is that loosy goosy then wow.

              Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me that you didn’t read the article, because it ends with the school allowing the student to display the patch after a meeting because they knew of the historical significance… They just made sure he couldn’t wear the other patches, which had semi-automatic firearms on them…

              So why tf are you here arguing about a ban that didn’t fucking happen?