Meta’s Ray-Ban glasses usually include an LED that lights up when the user is recording other people. One hobbyist is charging a small fee to disable that light, and has a growing list of customers around the country.
No it won’t. There’s a sensor that detects covering the LED.
This is the 3rd or 4th comment about this (across the Threadiverse) - why don’t people ask why this costs $60 - and then go and find out? It’s right fucking there in the article (before the paywall, even).
I’m going to be honest, I don’t really give a shit about meta or their shitty glasses so I never bothered to look into it and I’m still not going to bother now either.
That being said I still appreciate the correction.
No it won’t. There’s a sensor that detects covering the LED.
This is the 3rd or 4th comment about this (across the Threadiverse) - why don’t people ask why this costs $60 - and then go and find out? It’s right fucking there in the article (before the paywall, even).
I’m going to be honest, I don’t really give a shit about meta or their shitty glasses so I never bothered to look into it and I’m still not going to bother now either.
That being said I still appreciate the correction.
This is why I enjoy Lemmy; homie sticks to their point but thanks stranger for the correction. Respectful, I appreciate that.
This is a
Wendy’sRedditLemmy, Sir. We do not read articles past the headline.[sad voice] I knooowww
Just cover it with tape
deleted by creator
I said Threadiverse because as far as I know none of the threads I looked at came from anywhere except Lemmy and Piefed.