• mintycactus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You may add, that the author did not mention at all, that:

    • Brave is faster, than Firefox, even on linux desktop.
    • Speed is not the only advantage, Brave is more secure and private, do not collects data from users, as Firefox do.
    • Brave as a company is more privacy-oriented, than Mozilla.
    • Mozilla fires 250 devs, while CEO salary is 3m
    • Mozilla deals with Google, promotes their engine, Brave makes totally independent search without relying on Google/Bing at all.
    • Mozilla resells Mullvad VPN for higher price, Brave makes own VPN.

    Etc, etc, etc. This article is total bullshit.

    • Rooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brave is still bad. With their “incidents” they had. Brave is chromium = Google controlled in a way. Brave is a coorperation, yes a PROFIT seeking company. Mozilla does nit promote google, it uses duckduckgo as its default search engine. There are forks from Firefox too that hardens the browser and the develop/ceo is not a complete *ss. The referal link “scam” was real, they injected it in Amazon links…

      Screw Brave go search for a real alternative to google.

      • Kilgore Trout@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Firefox does default to Google. If you see DDG, it’s likely an edit by your distribution.

        Also, Brave Search is a real alternative. It’s one of the few engines aside from Google, Bing and Yandex that has its own crawler.

        • Rooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh yeah i forgot i used librewolf too much XD. Brave Search creeps on you. Privacy Policy is unreadable and unreachable. Tbh. if you want a privacy protecting search engine. Use Searx(ng).

      • zahel@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        These people are basically a cult. Do not bother trying to enlighten the Brave browser community cult. If you use brave, you are a certifiable idiot.

          • VonReposti@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hopefully the Digital Markets Act in EU will put an end to iOS’s browser monopoly. When that happens Firefox might be looking to port their Android browser to iOS which supports addons like uBlock but nothing is for certain right now.

            I know it isn’t hope you’re looking for, but it’s the best I can do with my current knowledge.

            • RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I appreciate that but my response was more intended to chastise the guy blanket labeling people cultists and idiots for no good reason because they hate a browser someone else uses.

              The system-wide AdGuard app handles most things well enough, and Brave does its thing on YouTube ads without issue.

              Firefox Focus will also take care of YouTube ads (if anyone else stumbles down this rabbit hole), but it’s too heavy-handed for me because I actually stay logged into my account and use my history.

              My Pi-hole install also handles all but YouTube if I’m at home, so there’s that.

          • Thetimefarm@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Doesn’t iOS only use webkit based browsers? I would imagine the reason you can get ad blocking through brave is some kind of deal they have with google. Which probably means they’re just giving them all the data google would collect normally.

            Firefox on iOS doesn’t have ad blocking because apple took support away in webkit. The only way brave could be doing it is by being white listed by the company serving the ad to you somehow.

            Both Mac and iOS have issues with VPN usage too but that’s unrelated to webkit.

            • RojoSanIchiban@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes Apple forces everyone through webkit and won’t allow third-party blockers. Brave on iOS was forked from Firefox anyway, and iirc uses the same API to block ads as Firefox Focus. Google is most definitely not involved, particularly because both block YouTube ads (and is my primary reason for using Brave anyway).

              I’m not sure what you’re referencing in regard to VPN usage; I have had zero problems with mine.

        • Rooki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Brave is way worse using Chromium. That is the point. Its dependent on google 100%. I dont know Fitefox? What is it? Is it a rare fox? Brave injects ads (targeted ads) into your websites. Injects referal urls into their results. The CEO is a corrupt bad person. They implemented in their earlier stages a hidden crypto miner. Recommending Extensions? Are you sure that chrome doesnt do it too?

    • Caravaggio@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Mozilla deals with Google

      With how much revenue comes from those deals, we might say it’s practically financed by Google. FF is more Google than Chromium-based Brave if you follow the money.