• FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      Popular vote: HRC: 16,917,853 Bernie: 13,210,550
      Percentage: 55.2%, 43.1%

      We’ve been discussing how Bernie lost the popular vote this entire time. It was a brutal defeat where he was 2 digit percent margin. Even worse, in 2020 he lost to Joseph Biden when Biden literally doubled his vote.

          • JandalsAweigh@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Not sure how that is discouraging. Also, if all it takes is a New Zealander to make some ambiguous comment which then discourages people to not vote, you are all in far greater trouble than you know. On top of that, your pointless comment contributed nothing and was also incorrect. Well done. America is safe now.

        • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          There is a concerted effort to keep everyone in the dark about this, including Americans, so it’s totally understandable.

          • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 day ago

            Bro it’s fucking exhausting how many progressive spaces refuse to admit that Bernie didn’t fucking get the votes to be the nominee. By like, a landslide.

            I do think that in hindsight Clinton should have made him her VP choice though.

            • hperrin@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Where have people refused to admit that? My point was that the superdelegate system is unfair, because it gives the party favorite a huge advantage before anyone has even voted. Regardless of whether I’m for or against the party favorite, I’m against the superdelegate system.

              • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                The party insiders favored the person who has always been in the party, over someone who joined that year? Cmon man.

                Bernie could have fixed this at any time, by actually joining the Democratic Party. He didn’t.

                Bernie lost by MILLIONS of actual votes. Not super delegates. Actual votes.

                Life ain’t fair. Just because it’s not fair, doesn’t mean people should sit at fucking home and sulk and not try and get something done instead of nothing.

                • hperrin@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  31 minutes ago

                  I don’t care who the party insiders support, and it’s completely understandable that they supported Hillary. But that shouldn’t translate to her having an enormous lead before anyone votes. That’s not democratic. Considering the Democtratic party is named after democracy, you’d think they should be a shining example of it.

                  I don’t know why you keep explaining that Bernie lost by millions of votes. I understand that. You are trying to convince me of something I already believe. I am simply trying to even explain to you that my problem is with what happened before anyone voted.

                  Based on what you just said though, I think you don’t fully understand how delegates work in the party. The superdelegates do matter. Let’s say, based on voting, Bernie and Hillary had won the exact same number of delegates. Hillary would have won, because she had more delegates when you add the superdelegates. Now let’s say, again based solely on voting, Bernie had won 300 more delegates than Hillary. Hillary would still have won, because she had ~360 superdelegates. Therefore, Bernie would have needed to get well over 50% of the vote to actually win. That’s what we mean when we say the party screwed him.

                  The popular vote doesn’t really matter in the Democratic Party, because what determines who becomes the nominee is the delegate vote (similar to how Hillary won the popular vote but lost the electoral college, so didn’t win the election). Most delegates are required to vote for the winner of the popular vote in their state, but the superdelegates can vote for whoever they want. They absolutely can sway a primary to their preferred candidate. ~15% of delegates are superdelegates, which means that a candidate the party insiders don’t like may need to win 66% of the popular vote to win the candidacy. That’s bad.

              • MartianRecon@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                15 hours ago

                Yep! But that moral superiority sure must feel good when we’re all paying six fucking bucks for gas, and we’re an international embarrassment right?