Not hating on open source, just let people use what fits their expectations and needs and stop deterring them with gatekeeping :P

UX = user experience

  • sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    FOSS can pay the rent. But the users that will complain about £20 for a lifetime of ad removal, definitely aren’t going to be the ones that help him should the bank come calling about late mortgage payments.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This is the same crap I left /r/Linux for way back in the day, so so so many people who are all “Linux is the best way and you’re stupid for even considering windows or mac” but unable to see realities. Yes, of course I love linux and FOSS, I use it as my primary driver, but we live in a society where free work doesn’t pay for housing.

      You’re exactly right, most of the “FOSS Open Source supreme” people will look at an app that was lovingly crafted for months, call it garbage, and then demand they make it free. I just can’t even with them.

      Meanwhile I’d love to see the stats on how many hours a week they put into FOSS apps on their own, and if they’ve given up their jobs to code for FOSS apps for the good of the community.

      I’m a developer. I code mostly proprietary stuff for my company. I’d gladly go code for FOSS projects, but so far my bank is just completely unwilling to cancel my mortgage payments, and my electricity, water, sewer, internet, they all want to be paid too, so unfortunately I’m stuck doing this.

    • Zeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lemmy doesn’t have ads. If you have to pay to remove them don’t you think something is wrong with that? Why not pay for the community and useful features instead?

      • Zetaphor@zemmy.cc
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        You’re not paying to remove ads from Lemmy. You can continue using Lemmy ad-free on mobile via the mobile site or any of the other PWA’s or native apps. What you’re paying to remove ads from is Sync. The developer has decided that they need to be compensated to sustain the amount of effort developing and maintaining the app requires. If you don’t want to pay that price with cash or your eyeballs then don’t use it.

        Nobody is forcing you to use Sync, nobody is forcing you to see ads. The beauty of a platform like Lemmy is you have the choice to use whatever client you want. That doesn’t mean you’re entitled to any of them.

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The ads finance the app, I think that’s perfectly fine (in principle).

        I asked the dev a few weeks ago, this app is literally his livelihood. And he has a pretty good track record of delivering good software. Why not support him?

        • Zeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you think more ads is the solution that’s good for you. Ads are society’s cancer, so I have little choice other than to block it. (Paying to get rid of ads perpetuates the idea that ads are profitable. That’s up to you.)

          • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            So the three options for him to keep developing that we know of are 1) Ads 2) Pay for a license or 3) Fundraising. He offers 1 and 2, and 3 is well known to not work, seriously nobody donates. Check out npm fund and how so little people used it that they just removed it.

            If your only argument is “I deserve things that took a lot of time and effort for free” then you aren’t getting much sympathy from me.

            • db2@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Check out npm fund

              Instructions unclear, I ran the command and now I have a shitcoin called Bitcoin Cash.

      • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        So for one he’s adding an option to fund your instance as well, but also just because it’s an app doesn’t mean that it also doesn’t require money.

        Your argument doesn’t come off as “so both should be free” but to me more like “oh yeah I’m surprised Lemmy doesn’t have an ad option”

        • Zeeroover@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’ve been on open source since the early 90s. I know damn well how people make money off of it and who makes money off of it.

          I support none of it if it starts including tracking and ads. It goes against the whole mindset. Google fanboys love it though.

          • Stumblinbear@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Then pay to remove the ads. Someone has to pay at some point and it’s either you or the guy already spending his time to make the app.

          • Zalack@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s why there is an option to disable ads… Everyone wins unless they think this person’s work should be distributed for free.