Good! This water poses less of a radioactive danger than the ocean it will drain into.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said Tuesday that the release of more than 1 million metric tons of wastewater — equivalent to more than 500 Olympic-size swimming pools — will take place in a safe manner.
“Instead of engaging in an honest debate about this reality, the Japanese government has opted for a false solution — decades of deliberate radioactive pollution of the marine environment — during a time when the world’s oceans are already facing immense stress and pressures,” said Shaun Burnie, senior nuclear specialist at Greenpeace East Asia.
“If the actual discharge deviates from the plan, even just a little bit, we will deem it a threat to the safety and health of our people, and immediately ask Japan to stop,” said Park Gu-yeon, vice minister of government policy coordination.
But opposition politicians have raised concerns that South Korean waters may be affected by the release, accusing President Yoon Suk Yeol of overlooking the health risks to mend diplomatic ties with Tokyo.
“The Yoon Suk Yeol administration is turning a blind eye to Japan’s dumping of nuclear-contaminated water into the sea,” said Kang Sun-woo, a spokeswoman for the main opposition Democratic Party.
In Tokyo, about 230 people gathered in front of the prime minister’s office Tuesday to protest the plan, holding signs and chanting slogans such as “Listen to the fishermen” and “The release will impact future generations.”
The original article contains 911 words, the summary contains 230 words. Saved 75%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!
Really easy test to check if the water is polluted or not, have the ceos and politicians drink it for a year
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Midgley_Jr.#Leaded_gasoline
On October 30, 1924, Midgley participated in a press conference to demonstrate the apparent safety of TEL, in which he poured TEL over his hands, placed a bottle of the chemical under his nose, and inhaled its vapor for 60 seconds, declaring that he could do this every day without succumbing to any problems.[7][13] However, the State of New Jersey ordered the Bayway plant to be closed a few days later, and Jersey Standard was forbidden to manufacture TEL again without state permission. Production was restarted in 1926 after intervention by the federal government. High-octane fuel, enabled by lead, was important to the military. Midgley later took a leave of absence from work after being diagnosed with lead poisoning.[14]
Not saying the Fukushima discharge is not safe (the radiation level is very low and the dilution factor of 500 swimming pools worth vs the whole ocean is huge), just that some folks will risk self-injury for profits.
The sky is really huge too
Don’t cut yourself with those edges.
deleted by creator
If they still have power plants then maybe this water is okay to cool down the rods as it is already radioactive.
Yay, that’ll fix that pesky climate problem!..
/s
Edit for the downvoters, you do realize the /s means sarcasm right?
@over_clox @alphacyberranger You can’t just put “/s” on and make it make sense. Tritium has no impact on climate change.
Yeah, they once said that about radium, uranium, etc. Decades later they’re like fuck, we were wrong, this is toxic dangerous stuff.
So what, let’s just keep playing games with nature? How you think we ended up in the situation we’re in with the climate today?
In the past couple centuries we’ve made many advancements, and many mistakes. We’ve also made a whole lot more people since then, and people are a huge catalyst for this changing climate.
Go ahead, name me even one other species on this planet that requires all this energy production to survive…
Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it. Science has been wrong before, on very dangerous levels they couldn’t even grasp. Do you really trust when current science says tritium is “safe”?..
@over_clox radium and uranium also have nothing to do with climate change.
These are unrelated concepts and it is unhelpful to conflate them.
Our climate is more than just the air, water and temperature, it’s everything in our environment. If that happens to include excess radioactive materials that might cause cancer, is that not also part of your climate and habitat?
But hey, let’s not worry about it. We need to harvest all the energy of the planet and wonder why it’s so damn hot…
I think the confusion might come from a misunderstanding of what the word climate means. Climate is defined as the “long-term pattern of weather” in an area. Cancer isn’t really a product of bad climate, and this won’t create long term radioactive storms.
@over_clox If tou até randomly going to decide that established terms or art have special meanings which you get to change on the fly to suit, then this would appear to be pointless good day and, *plonk*
You’re downvoted because this has negible impact on anything. The water released barely contains any radiation at all. Also, did you know that a truck full of bananas is radioactive enough to trigger a false alarm on a radiation detector looking for smuggled nuclear weapons?
