inari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoAI/LLM Usage Becoming A "Denial of Service Attack" On Open-Source Project Maintainerswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square20linkfedilinkarrow-up1247arrow-down14
arrow-up1243arrow-down1external-linkAI/LLM Usage Becoming A "Denial of Service Attack" On Open-Source Project Maintainerswww.phoronix.cominari@piefed.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square20linkfedilink
minus-squarebluGill@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up21arrow-down2·1 month agoIf you know what you’re doing, AI can be a very useful tool. However, a lot of people have no clue what they’re doing and they use AI to amplify their incompetence.
minus-squaredandi8@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down2·1 month agoMaybe one day someone can actually prove the mythical usefulness of AI beyond software devs who think they’re 19% faster but are actually 10% slower.
minus-squareschipelblorp@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 month agoYes. They could definitely fund studies to do so! They have the money! Hmm.
minus-squareCrit@lemmy.wtflinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoThat study was redone and the results were less conclusive the second time around
minus-squaredandi8@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 month agoThey were less conclusive because they couldn’t find participants. Probably because they paid a third of what the previous study did.
minus-squarephil@lemmy.openitco.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 month agoI haven’t met a single AI user who doesn’t claim (s)he uses it in a smart way.
If you know what you’re doing, AI can be a very useful tool. However, a lot of people have no clue what they’re doing and they use AI to amplify their incompetence.
Maybe one day someone can actually prove the mythical usefulness of AI beyond software devs who think they’re 19% faster but are actually 10% slower.
Yes. They could definitely fund studies to do so! They have the money! Hmm.
That study was redone and the results were less conclusive the second time around
They were less conclusive because they couldn’t find participants. Probably because they paid a third of what the previous study did.
I haven’t met a single AI user who doesn’t claim (s)he uses it in a smart way.