• Kogasa@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    The only takeaway is that the Indie Game Awards’ rule is overly restrictive. Woops, one of your contracted artists used a GenAI model to generate a music playlist to set the mood while he was working on your game, you’re disqualified and the fact that you didn’t come forward with this information immediately makes you a liar. Obviously absurd. If they’re going to take a strong anti-AI stance, it should be more realistic. At some point, maybe even already, every single competitor should be disqualified but isn’t aware or forthcoming about it, so what’s the rule actually doing except rewarding dishonesty?

    • nostrauxendar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The GenAI asset was in the final release. It wasn’t that a subcontractor used GenAI to create a music playlist to listen to while they worked. That’s a very different thing.

      • Kogasa@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        It was a placeholder texture that was always intended to be replaced by actual art made by a human. It was overlooked accidentally and promptly replaced. So no, it isn’t a very different thing. It was never supposed to be part of the game or even a significant part of its development.

        • nostrauxendar@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          To me, “the music a subcontractor listens to while they work” is different to “the thing they’re working on”.