ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 10 days agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up1513arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1505arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 10 days agomessage-square133linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squarefloquant@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·8 days agoThen why are the Epstein files being heavily redacted? Does the government have something to hide?
minus-squareImaginary_Stand4909@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 days agoWell, this is the INDIAN Supreme Court, but I will certainly use that line when the US government decides to parrot “if you have nothing to hide”
Then why are the Epstein files being heavily redacted? Does the government have something to hide?
Well, this is the INDIAN Supreme Court, but I will certainly use that line when the US government decides to parrot “if you have nothing to hide”