ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square131linkfedilinkarrow-up1516arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1508arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square131linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareLavaPlanet@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up10·5 months agoTo them I’d say, Define “nothing”, and then tell me that’s a constant.
minus-squarequalia@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·5 months agoThey’d probably think they’re all smart and respond, “0…? Of course”
To them I’d say, Define “nothing”, and then tell me that’s a constant.
They’d probably think they’re all smart and respond, “0…? Of course”