ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 11 days agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square133linkfedilinkarrow-up1514arrow-down18file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1506arrow-down1external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 11 days agomessage-square133linkfedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareStern@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·11 days agoI presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·11 days agoI feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
minus-squarerageagainstmachines@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-29 days agoDidn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.
I presume they’re okay with the first surveillance cameras being in their bedrooms then.
I feel like the best way to combat this is to dig up info on politicians and release it all publicly. Nothing illegal about that. If I knew how, I would.
Didn’t Jon Oliver threaten to do that in an episode about data brokers? Not sure if he ever did.