• ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 天前

    Small LLMs could be useful in-browser for automating actions - e.g. reject all cookie/tracking popups. Consent-o-matic only works for half the sites I encounter and doesn’t support mobile

    Security however is another rabbit hole

    • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 天前

      Yeah, no. LLMs are known untrustworthy so need a validation step so they aren’t a great fit for any automation you don’t look at… unless you don’t really care about the outcome

      What would work here is a browser API for cookie settings. You set your preferences with the browser and the sites check the browser. I don’t think this is likely to happen because people with influence and money in tech wouldn’t be able to point to how annoying the modals are and say “Look X government is doing something we don’t like so you should be angry and not trust them”

        • tofubl@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 天前

          Curious. There are certain ones it doesn’t work on, both on desktop and mobile, but works as normal other than that. Maybe check your settings?

    • just_another_person@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 天前

      LLMs are useful for summarization. That is it.

      How often are you needing a summary of the thing that you’re browsing at the moment?

    • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 天前

      You could tey Super Agent on firefox. Though they only have 40 free pop ups before paying either subscription or one time pay.

      It worked really well for me and I didn’t realize it was doing its thing until I quickly reached the 40 pop up limit.